Earlier quoted context omitted.
> that British labour was suddenly more price competitive That seems to translate to "workers were getting paid less and their savings were devalued" to me. Am I mistaken?
> That seems to translate to "workers were getting paid less and their savings were devalued" to me. Am I mistaken? Sure, that's one way to look at it. But then you have to ask yourself why countries deliberately try to devalue their currencies and why other countries get mad when that happens.
This isn't just about countries as an abstract. It's about the people and the impact on them.