Live data from Hacker News

Halide Mark II

halide.cam

61–70 of 101 posts

Re: Halide Mark II

#61
post #16

That was confusing. When I saw the app and that it offers in-app purchases, I thought something minimal would be possible without a purchase. But after downloading and launching it, I see the prompt to buy the subscription or the one time purchase, and nothing more. The app description on the store doesn’t make this — that a purchase must be made to use it — clear either. Edit: An observation I’ve had is that third p…

Halide author here. Previously, you would pay-once at the time of download, so this isn't much different than what we had before. That said, we wish the App Store offered a better solution than what we had to settle with; we'd much rather people know up-front the business model than download the app, be surprised, and possibly leave a negative review. As far as replacing the first party camera, it's by far our top us…

Random Halide user here. (I haven't upgraded the app because I'd rather any bugs be ironed out first.)

I think there should be more details on what customers get with either Pay-Once (which all existing purchasers get), and/or the Membership.

If I were a new user, I would think that Pay-Once means that I'm set for life(time of the product) (seeing as how it's equivalent to slightly under 3 years of membership payments), but the comments here sound like there's a basic feature set that new users would have to pay ~$30 for at first, and newer features would be restricted to people who commit additional regular annual payments.

It's very confusing.

Re: Halide Mark II

#62
As a v1 user, I’m confused about the payment options. From reading the blog post, it seems a new user could choose to either pay once for lifetime access, or pay yearly. However, since I’ve been given the upgrade and 1 year of membership for free, I don’t see the lifetime option. Presumably the discounted lifetime price will no longer be available by the time my 1 year runs out. How can I lock in the discounted price now?

Re: Halide Mark II

#63
Quite surprised when opened the app, download with in-app purchases to find out a paywall - it’s unusable without buying

sorry to ask, but inflating downloads number this way? Can’t find a good reason...

The app looks great btw

Re: Halide Mark II

#64
post #16

That was confusing. When I saw the app and that it offers in-app purchases, I thought something minimal would be possible without a purchase. But after downloading and launching it, I see the prompt to buy the subscription or the one time purchase, and nothing more. The app description on the store doesn’t make this — that a purchase must be made to use it — clear either. Edit: An observation I’ve had is that third p…

Halide author here. Previously, you would pay-once at the time of download, so this isn't much different than what we had before. That said, we wish the App Store offered a better solution than what we had to settle with; we'd much rather people know up-front the business model than download the app, be surprised, and possibly leave a negative review. As far as replacing the first party camera, it's by far our top us…

I hate apps that you download and the first thing you have to do is to pay.

It is a dark pattern as far as I am concerned. Peple have invest a little more In an when they dowloaded it to their phones so it might possibly get a better conversion rate.

What is even more annoying in this pattern is that you have to fill out all sorts of data and configuration and once yo are done with all that and the app owner has collected all that nice data, you are prompted to pay and no other action is possible.

Further it hides the true cost of the app, unless you go to the app page on the app store scroll al the way down the page and click on the little arrow to see what the in app prices are.

I strongly prefer pricing up front. It is easy to understand, honest, and clear.

Re: Halide Mark II

#65
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Halide author here. Previously, you would pay-once at the time of download, so this isn't much different than what we had before. That said, we wish the App Store offered a better solution than what we had to settle with; we'd much rather people know up-front the business model than download the app, be surprised, and possibly leave a negative review. As far as replacing the first party camera, it's by far our top us…

What's the backstory here? (why did you have to settle on free-with-immediate-IAP?)

I’m guessing because they want to offer both a pay upfront option _and_ a subscription option. There’s no way to do this on iOS.

Re: Halide Mark II

#67
I love Halide on my iPhone. Having a great UI for your camera makes such a big difference. My big camera still takes better images, though. I wish it were possible to use a great interface like Halide but acquire the image from another device. There should be a protocol or something.

Re: Halide Mark II

#68
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DNG are capable of embedding processing settings. I believe Halide is using DNG. I'm sure Ben will have more to say

Yup. We save DNGs, but aside from attaching your geo tag (if you have it enabled), we don't touch the DNG at all. DNGs support XMP, which is an XML based way of describing edits. However, we're doing post processing that can't really be described in XMP. We're launching Instant RAW as an MVP to see how people use it, so to that end we've only focused on "I want amazing details from RAW but I have no idea how to use L…

Even someone like me, a VFX professional who does a lot of RAW processing, dealing with RAW is sometimes such a chore. There are plenty of times where I want to use Halide and I want to shoot RAW but I also want to easily share a photo (without going through the laborious processing thing). So I'm really looking forward to that.

I'm curious in what way you believe your processing pipeline for "getting to jpg" (RAW -> Instant Raw Processing -> JPEG) is superior to Apple's (capture -> Apple's Processing -> JPEG). Does it just come down to different aesthetic preferences and one-frame-per-image? Or is there something else to it?

Also, love the XDR Analysis. So cool.

Re: Halide Mark II

#69
post #23
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Such a sad part of iOS. I have several high quality photo apps I prefer, and almost always end up using the default one because its easier to access.

To be fair, Android also doesn’t make third party camera apps accessible while locked.

But why bring up Android at all? Halide doesn't work on Android and this entire discussion is about iOS.
Post reply on HN