For those asking "Why now?" ... here's a couple wild takes: The Interstellar Squid have arrived. They're hanging out around Saturn (cf "largest comet ever"). Even after a century of preparation and propaganda, there is a large fraction of humanity who refuses to conceive of intelligence other than human. This is the last gasp at preparing them. That, or the political corruption has gotten so rank that they're scrapin…
Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
591–600 of 673 posts
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#592Earlier quoted context omitted.
The existence of National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn would seem to support the thesis that we have crazy people who lie at the highest levels of government.
Don’t you think congress should investigate these crazy people then?
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#593https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Myq_Hc_39aI&t=1898s
Now, I find it difficult to believe there isn't a plethora of intelligent life out there in the universe. There are just far too many star systems. I also find it difficult to believe that any have to come to visit. There is no evidence to support it, and think about it: the time, energy, and technology required to travel the vast expanse of space to reach Earth are unimaginably huge. And if they had that kind of technology, it would seem unlikely that they would routinely crash once they got here. Furthermore, we've only been producing radio waves for a short period of time, nowhere near long enough to signal a remote civilization that we're even here (I'm not sure our radio waves would even be detectable at those distances). And why would they even want to? At that level of sophistication, we would be nothing more than ants to them. Bacteria in a petri dish.
Yet, even we, as humans, spend a lot of effort researching ants. And bacteria, in petri dishes. And if the collective DMT community's experiences are to be believed, and we have contacted and communicated with advanced alien intelligences, they usually seem to be quite interested and curious about us too. This is a huge leap, but maybe the universe isn't what it seems. It could be data, data that could be manipulated from outside the confines of the simulation. Or, maybe there are higher dimensions of reality, that we are currently (mostly) incapable of detecting from our vantage point. Maybe the aliens exist in higher dimensions, and use these UFOs as lower dimension probes, that don't have to travel vast distances of space because they don't originate from other star systems. Maybe they crash because they're SUPPOSED to be found, maybe they want us to reverse engineer them to learn something, to accelerate our technological and scientific advancement.
Or maybe it's all poppycock. Maybe we're the first species that will possibly achieve interstellar transportation, and it will us that are the aliens visiting other primitive worlds. Only time will tell.
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#594Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the scenario I'm suggesting, if I understand you correctly, the ICIG talked to the same people that Grusch had. Those people said something to the effect of "yes, I have seen intelligence documents and other evidence that described alien spacecraft and biological material." I.e. Grusch and the people he talked to believe what they're saying because of documents intentionally made to appear legitimate. A well-desig…
You are 100% correct that this could be a giant psy-op constructed to convince people of something insane like aliens. From what I’ve heard, the ICIG has gotten testimony under oath from people purported to be apart of the reverse engineering programs, and they have provided locations and photo evidence. There’s also a report that one of these craft are [so large that it can’t be moved](0). Congress could send a spec…
I do absolutely think that Congress should follow the trail and see if there's physical evidence. I'm just saying that I think that what they'll find is that there was never real evidence, just intentionally fake documents and maybe faked artifacts.
Potentially, it could also be a mix of true details, but wrapped in a false backstory. e.g. if an intelligence agency captured a Russian weapon prototype in some underhanded way that would cause a political incident, and wanted to have people reverse-engineer it, they could remove any identifying markings, then let three people examine it separately. Reverse-engineer A would be told "it's from a vehicle of unknown origin that crashed in Colorado". Reverse-engineer B would be told "it's from a North Korean military satellite". Reverse-engineer C would be told "it's from a crash site in Wyoming". All three might be provided with different, faked photo evidence that matched the story as part of their documentation. If any of those stories showed up in counterintelligence records, the intelligence agency would know which engineer couldn't be trusted. Everything else I described for the simpler scenario applies there too.
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#595Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they work for a week and finish up on Friday... Like everybody else.
well that is rather curious. for a site with the demographics that it has, one might expect an acknowledgement that thou shalt not deploy on friday.
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#596If anyone is interested in seeing rigorously analyzed video material, I recommend the YouTube channel of Mick West[1]. He is an experienced programmer that has written a software to combine available data into a 3D space. This makes it possible to recreate situations and validate/invalidate hypotheses by stepping through time and looking from different camera angles. He also analyzed the famous gimbal and flir videos…
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#597Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe it's better to compare to personal modes of traffic and not airliners?
I mean sure. Cars, for example, are significantly more dangerous than airliners and people crash all the time. But if alien craft are as safe as cars then that just leads back to my original point that airliners are better at traveling safely through our atmosphere than physics-defying alien craft.
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#598What convinces all of the aliens to crash their UFOs in America? Or is every govt part of the conspiracy?
For entertainment, consider that the Cold War could have been about finding intact UAPs, at least in some of the scuffles.
Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#599Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites
#600Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don’t you think congress should investigate these crazy people then?
I wouldn't trust Congress to do a good job investigating practically anything. They have their share of crazies and chronic liars.