Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, a quick call is not a courteous first step when someone tells you that you've destroyed 20 years of their work and they no longer want to have anything to do with you. Suggesting that such an offence can be resolved by a "quick call" is extraordinarily disrespectful. A courteous first step would have been to apologise profusely, revert the damage that the bot did, and ask to set up a call to discuss what it might…
This is NOT the leader of the new transition tool! This is just a customer service manager in Indonesia who is trying to gather more information. The steps that you describe might well be taken after the "quick call" gathers more information and figures out the people to escalate it to. You are being entirely unreasonable in what you are demanding. This isn't a response from the Mozilla CEO. This is sometime in custo…
End of Japanese community
571–580 of 820 posts
Re: End of Japanese community
#572Ladybird and other browser alternatives cannot come fast enough. Every other week we've got a thread here about some stupid move Mozilla have made, I can't remember the last time I heard positive news about Mozilla.
Re: End of Japanese community
#573Ladybird and other browser alternatives cannot come fast enough. Every other week we've got a thread here about some stupid move Mozilla have made, I can't remember the last time I heard positive news about Mozilla.
There is a very loud part of HN that strongly dislikes mozilla/firefox. It's disproportionate imo, I don't understand why they're singled out so often.
Re: End of Japanese community
#574Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI wouldnt misspell “truly”. It’s a human.
Two observations: You are probably right. But if a random spelling error would allow a person to get away with using AI in professional communications then you can expect that pattern to show up all over the place. I'm trying to imagine the prompt here. "Hey, ChatGPT, it looks like our org fucked up and now a hotheaded volunteer makes us look like idiots. Please generate a flippant response that pretends to show we c…
Re: End of Japanese community
#575I know that everyone has already given their opinions about what kinds of people are involved and their motivations, but this is really about two fallible humans, one listing grievances and another asking to open a communication channel. That's it. Anything else you read into this is going to be fraught with your own coloring based on a hundred words written in text (a notoriously difficult medium to establish emotio…
Re: End of Japanese community
#576Earlier quoted context omitted.
My guess would be the anger comes from implication that is a possible solution at all. This type of “hop on a call” request is not usually actually designed to “truly understand what you're struggling with.” (words from the post) Instead it is usually a PR tactic. The goal of the call requester is to get your acquiescence. Most people are less likely to be confrontational and stand up for themselves when presented wi…
Are we reading too much into one sentence? HN comments dese days
For the reasons I stated above, the response comes off as faking understanding to manage a PR issue rather than genuine empathy and possible negotiation, but I am often wrong about many things.
Re: End of Japanese community
#577Google “sumobot;” ai summary says:
A sumobot is a robot designed to push an opponent out of a circular arena, similar to human sumo wrestling.Re: End of Japanese community
#578Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reframing someone's disagreement as them "struggling with something" is incredibly patronizing and condescending and dirty conversational pool.
No it's not. It's a validation of the fact that something is so frustrating they are quitting over it. The idea that it is patronizing or condescending makes zero sense to me. It's a factual description.
Re: End of Japanese community
#579Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? You’re referring to tue club that makes Immich, right? What’s so bad about them?
I also love Immich, but it seems like there's some controversy about FUTO: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45666239
Drew’s position that interacting with people with bad opinions makes you evil by association doesn’t strike me as mainstream (or future-proof for that matter).