Live data from Hacker News

Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

spacenews.com

571–580 of 799 posts

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#571

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's murky. NASA outsources a lot of money to SpaceX because Musk could burn through risk and money at levels NASA would get cancelled for. At what point is SpaceX's benefiting from tax money and NASA technology become a reason to fold into a national asset. China didn't achieve its Great Leap Forward by pandering to wealthy celebrities who cosplay as geniuses.

The Great Leap Forward (1958-62) was an absolute disaster that resulted in widespread famine.

It's a great example of Move Fast and Break Things applied to government.

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#572

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's also a mark of the self delusion some of these "Great Men" tend to have, before you even get into the surrounding yes-men & ketamine. Probably some sort of "well I am worth $400M, but if I can get that to $2M, I can do my Mars space colony with enough room for my harem, for sure". vs "Gee I have more money than one can ever spend and remain mortal.. I could go enjoy my life like Bezos before it all evapo…

The Bezod who sat next to him at the inauguration?

Sure they all attended

But few have tied themselves as explicitly to the man as musk. Funded. Wore the dumb hats. Went on campaign trail.

It was like a deep romance. You don’t walk away from that stench.

Meanwhile Bezos has been on his yacht in the Mediterranean lol

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#573

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Corporate politics doesn’t adequately punish the traits narcissists and sociopaths present. Quite the contrary, those traits can easily become assets in their careers.

Exactly. It's an evolutionarily beneficial trait. We're no longer competing with other species (why social traits developed), we're competing against each other (where the right amount of anti-social traits works best).

We desperately need to fix those incentives for society and civilisation to survive.

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#575

[flagged]

For what it's worth, the way you've phrased this question doesn't sound like you want to discuss any of these issues. It sounds like you have bones to pick with what people have said and want to argue about it.

Yes. He's insinuating that the only reason you would dislike musk is sure to his association with trump. He's also insinuating that people who dislike trump just like the opposite of what trump like, so that is trump dislikes musk then they musk like him.

He's just a troll.

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#576
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not racist to push baseless claims the opposition who is black was born in Africa and not qualified to run for office ? How else would you define racism if not across xenophobic lines by the color of ones skin ?

Obama was not his opposition, and that was not his campaign.

So when Trump admitted on Howard Stern that he likes to walk in on naked teenage girls because his role of running the teen universe beauty pageant allows him to get away with that, that is ok because he wasn't running a campaign at the time?

Jump to 1:38 https://youtu.be/kikTv0I8XVw?si=VVfSpMDt7rKEIcRJ

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#577

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Musk is a known pedophile-accusation-maker Laughably so. Musk: I can save those boys trapped in the cave! We can use this stupid submarine thing of mine. Hero: No need, I and my Navy SEAL cave-diving pals have got this. Musk: How dare you! You're a pedo. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-44779998 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50695593 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45418245

He was sued for that by the guy and won his trial by convincing the judge that "pedo" is actually common Afrikaner lingo, and it was a casual insult. This country is a joke. Also doesn't remove the fact Trump was one of Epstein's closest friends, and everything points to him being involved in some way or the other in those affairs.

Musk's brother was introduced to his girlfriend by Epstein.

Epstein mentored a young model who went onto be a neurosurgeon and married Microsoft's Sinofsky.

Bill Gates had a meeting with Epstein during which an ex-girlfriend of Epstein's who was once Miss Sweden just happened to turn up with her 15 year old daughter.

I'd quite like someone to investigate if our billionaires are being honeypotted left, right and center because it appears you can control a big swathe of the world's wealth if you get old rich nerds laid.

It's still not clear if Epstein made his money by blackmailing yet another Billionaire.

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#578

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hot take: they're both baddies, and they always will be.

Was he when he was saving the world from climate change? Was trump a baddie when he was a B-tier celeb on Apprentice?

He was never saving the world from climate change, you're just naive.

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#579

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It turns out that when elections are fought on the basis of identity (race, religion) etc corruption is actually considered a benefit! This is because the loyalists interpret this as "we" are winning and "they" are losing. I witnessed this up close in India where parties openly exist to benefit certain constituencies based on caste, language, religion and so on. It is horrifying to see this attitude take root in my a…

>It turns out that when elections are fought on the basis of identity (race, religion) etc corruption is actually considered a benefit! This is because the loyalists interpret this as "we" are winning and "they" are losing. So how could one design a political system so this behavior doesn't emerge / is not incentivized?

Get rid of FPTP and the Electoral College that enables a two-party stranglehold. If a vote for a third party wasn't a wasted vote, we could see nuanced parties and politicians emerge that don't have to tow a party line.

Re: Musk-Trump dispute includes threats to SpaceX contracts

#580

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It turns out that when elections are fought on the basis of identity (race, religion) etc corruption is actually considered a benefit! This is because the loyalists interpret this as "we" are winning and "they" are losing. So how could one design a political system so this behavior doesn't emerge / is not incentivized?

Get rid of FPTP and the Electoral College that enables a two-party stranglehold. If a vote for a third party wasn't a wasted vote, we could see nuanced parties and politicians emerge that don't have to tow a party line.

Ranked Choice Voting goes a long way to solving this as well.
Post reply on HN