Earlier quoted context omitted.
Puritans. We “banned” alcohol for 13 years. America’s greatest battle is with our dark religious past. We claim to be secular but really it’s an aspiration.
eh, I feel like alcohol bans were fashionable in the past. USSR did it, Finland did it...
A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
571–580 of 609 posts
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#572Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it's really not straightforward to know what would be the outcome of such a lawsuit. Google's ToS is one thing but the main point is that random user uploading family photos is not a protected group, so Google refusing service is very much their right. The state usually cannot force otherwise.
The state should. Otherwise, what’s the point of having it.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#573Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha yeah, in Europe there are often naked children running around at the beach. In Germany, there are places (especially lakes) where everyone is walking around, swimming and sunbathing naked - Sometimes the whole family. For me it was quite a shock initially but now I think it's fine.
I find that a bit weird tbh. I mean, if we look at human tribes throughout the world/history, and even what is the most common nowadays in african tribes which maintain their dressing habits, they usually cover their genitals. It indicates to me it is human nature to do that. It seems to me, in some countries for several reasons, they are going against the grain, purely out of culture. But there's something weird abo…
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#574Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are you talking about? Which "certain" states? Iran, my old country, may be the 9th largest consumer of alcohol per capita [1,2]. There are hundreds of deaths due to wood-alcohol poisoning every year [3], mostly from people making moonshine from raisins and not being diligent enough to remove the stems, in lieu of access to safe drinking alcohol. I personally know many people who abuse alcohol just to be able to…
> puritan Christians I’ve lost track of how many people in this thread have blamed Christians. Why? Christian’s do not have a ban on alcohol. Where is this idea coming from, or are we just spreading hate?
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#575Earlier quoted context omitted.
Autopay is simple to set up with any hosting provider. If you're in a financial place where the $5/mo and $10/yr payments might bounce... yeah, probably don't pay for email. As far as the social engineering goes, personally I gladly take that risk in order to bring my email firmly into my control. If I'm going to lose access to my email, I want it to be because I did something stupid, not because an algorithm flagged…
I'm not fully confident that I'll never cancel a credit card that pays annual subscription. Generally it's fine because alert email would come on my inbox, but it's email infrastructure so I need extra attention.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#576Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not fully confident that I'll never cancel a credit card that pays annual subscription. Generally it's fine because alert email would come on my inbox, but it's email infrastructure so I need extra attention.
You can prepurchase a domain for 10 years. Set a calendar reminder 9 years from now to renew for another 10..
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#577Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Apple who caused an immense controversy with its CSAM scanning debacle? All of Big Tech is ultimately not so different.
They cancelled the CSAM scanning project. In contrast, Google has been doing CSAM (and apparently AI porn detection) for years. Also, the bone-headed Apple plan had safeguards that would have prevented the victim in the article from losing their account. The two policies aren't remotely comparable.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#578Earlier quoted context omitted.
I run a server at home and I’ve set up Nextcloud. I don’t trust it to be more reliable than a paid service. The thing about self hosted solutions is you’re completely on your own if something goes wrong. You need to make sure you’re backing things up, that you can restore your Nextcloud configuration if your sql database takes a dump or you fat finger and delete some config files (I’ve done both). Or if you have a po…
If something goes wrong with your google account (or other SaaS that would lose your data, or ban you without recourse), you are not even on your own, you're just trully fucked. It's poof gone and no local/internet tech geek will be able to help you. If something goes wrong with your at home nextcloud, you still have the data/hw, and you can either get help troubleshooting from someone who understands what they're do…
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#579Earlier quoted context omitted.
slip of the tongue/keyboard. It was obviously supposed to read "There's no such thing as cloud storage, just somebody else's computer." It's a fairly well known phrase[0][1]. It's even a laptop sticker[2]. And no, they're not going to spin up a VM. They should buy their own NAS and back everything up to that if they care enough about privacy to avoid cloud storage. [0] https://pocketnow.com/no-such-thing-as-the-cloud…
Just because it is well known doesn’t make it true. S3 alone is made up of 100+ microservices
I've also just seen, which you didn't disclose, that you work at AWS[0]. Not disclosing a vested interest doesn't exactly lend confidence to your impartiality. Either way, I'm still not sure how your argument is a rebuttal to my proposal. SO far it seems to amount to "other cloud providers exist" and "Your mistype wasn't accurate"?
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#580Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Criticize the US President all you like on every social network: not a problem. given that this [1] already happened in my country, and also this [2] also happened (just to name a couple) and nobody paid, that there are 13,000 American soldiers on my Country's soil and that this [3] man has been POTUS and is probably running again for election, I wouldn't say "not a problem". US could reach me at my house if they w…
Here's an example of a chinese Univerity of Minnesota grad student that tweeted Winnie the Pooh (among other things) while in the US, and was later imprisoned in China for it: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/university-of-minnes...
I don't support China methods, but mocking the president of your country in public, from abroad, when you know what your Country is is capable of is not a smart move, ever.
It happens everywhere, different solutions, same goal: censorship and setting an example.
https://time.com/4644297/saturday-night-live-katie-rich-susp...