Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft acquires Github

blogs.microsoft.com

571–580 of 840 posts

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#571

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can understand those concerns, but what can they do to convince you they have changed?

He consistent and have a good track record for years. It feels just like yesterday that Microsoft was spying on windows boxes. In my mind, everyone has a "Days since last accident" counter in their head, and Microsoft's number is quite low.

*Be

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#572

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You actually can’t turn it off, and they still refuse to publish the complete list of what is collected. You need an enterprise version to disable as much as they will let you, and even then, they still force quite a bit of collection.

"This article describes all types of diagnostic data collected by Windows at the Full level (inclusive of data collected at Basic), with comprehensive examples of data we collect per each type" https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/configuration/windo...

there are other classes of data besides 'diagnostic data'. The additional word 'diagnostic' is a tell.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#573
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

* Drop DirectX for Vulkan * Drop MSVC for Clang or GCC * Drop Edge for Firefox or Chromium because they love open-source, right?

Vulkan is just a 3D graphics and compute API, it cannot replace DirectX because it doesn't support most of the things DirectX does. Did you mean to say Direct3D? That's still leave you with input, sound, maths, and 2D missing.

Yes, I meant Direct3D.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#574
post #422

This is a wake up call. Too many things are relying on Github right now. Microsoft was part of the PRISM program. If Microsoft shares SSL certs with NSA they could do MITM attacks. What if in some very specific cases you download dependencies from GitHub and they give you a different version with malicious code? It's the NSA. They could be smart enough to only deploy those attacks on production servers were nobody is…

[deleted]

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#575

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can understand those concerns, but what can they do to convince you they have changed?

* Drop Windows and contribute to WINE * Drop OOXML and make ODF the default format * Drop the patents * Drop the telemetry * Drop Xbox * Drop DirectX * Drop the cloud garbage * Drop or open MSVC * Drop or open Edge * Actually open .NET

I can see, or kinda see your point for all of these except for the Xbox. Why would you want them to drop that?

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#576

> And Microsoft is all-in on open source. We have been on a journey with open source, and today we are active in the open source ecosystem, we contribute to open source projects, and some of our most vibrant developer tools and frameworks are open source. When it comes to our commitment to open source, judge us by the actions we have taken in the recent past, our actions today, and in the future. It’s a fair point bu…

Corporations aren't people. If you change the leadership and change employee incentives, it might as well be a different company. Sure there's cultural inertia... but incentives trump culture every time.

The thought that Satya Nadella, who joined Microsoft in 1992 and then steadily climbed his way (in extremely fierce competition) to the top would be a better, more moral person than the "old guard" is kind of funny.

He's just younger and less out of touch than Gates (and particularly Balmer). Many people seem to mistake ascribe this aspect of him (more in touch with modern tech) with some higher moral standards etc than e.g. Gates/Ballmer. I don't see why he should be any less fierce/brutal.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#577

> And Microsoft is all-in on open source. We have been on a journey with open source, and today we are active in the open source ecosystem, we contribute to open source projects, and some of our most vibrant developer tools and frameworks are open source. When it comes to our commitment to open source, judge us by the actions we have taken in the recent past, our actions today, and in the future. It’s a fair point bu…

I'd believe them if they open sourced Windows. They could still keep their web platforms (Office365, Azure, etc.) closed but it would be a huge statement to open up Windows 10.

(Never going to happen, not just for philosophical reasons, but I'm sure legal reasons too)

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#578
post #363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also the company that was responsible for killing the Limux project[0]. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiMux

> In November Munich city council decided to revert to Windows by 2020 with all systems being replaced by Windows 10 counterparts. > Reasons cited were adoption and users being unhappy with the lack of software available for Linux. > A report commissioned by Munich and undertaken by Accenture found the most important issues were organizational. > In 2018, journalistic group Investigate Europe released a video documen…

Shortly before the official announcement of the end of LiMux, Microsoft's German headquarter moved to Munich [1]. It's also estimated to cost about 89 million € to return back to Windows [2 (german)], including 24 million € for "external consulting".

1: https://mspoweruser.com/microsoft-germany-moves-into-a-new-h...

2: https://www.heise.de/ct/ausgabe/2017-26-Muenchens-Rueckfall-...

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#579
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was also the Linkedin acquisition pitch. I wonder how that played out.

LinkedIn still exists and still seems to think they are a separate company. Rumor has it that Satya is furious he still gets so many LinkedIn emails, but is keeping hands off.

> Rumor has it that Satya is furious he still gets so many LinkedIn emails, but is keeping hands off.

Well, he's exhibiting far more self control than I would be able to. Linked-in has the worst email practices of any legitimate company I can think of.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#580
post #422

This is a wake up call. Too many things are relying on Github right now. Microsoft was part of the PRISM program. If Microsoft shares SSL certs with NSA they could do MITM attacks. What if in some very specific cases you download dependencies from GitHub and they give you a different version with malicious code? It's the NSA. They could be smart enough to only deploy those attacks on production servers were nobody is…

They could also do it regardless of whether or not Microsoft owns them or whatever favorite acronym authorizes them, or whatever. I've never understood why people love freaking out about this stuff. If the NSA felt like spying on you, pro tip, they're gonna be able to do it. If you care about keeping your shit secure, it shouldn't be on the internet at all.
Post reply on HN