Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, I feel that. The ageism in tech probably has something to do with it. When I see some of these brobdingnagian disasters, I always wonder if there were any adults in the room, when the idea was greenlighted.
Ageism is definitely part of it, but most people just don't seem to care to learn in general, and of course the incentives are against it. They'd rather treat the general version of Greenspun's 10th rule as a commandment, and create a new, ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of some fraction of whatever already addresses the requirement, than learn about how to use some existing tool that th…
Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
551–560 of 760 posts
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#552Earlier quoted context omitted.
They’re idiots who hacked together a shockingly useful tool by leveraging the billions of dollars they received from shamelessly hyping up chatbots. The Claude Code leak makes this very clear.
Pretty wild to say that the company with one of the best models (arguably the best) is a bunch of idiots.
Even idiots can succeed if you uncritically funnel them hundreds of billions of dollars.
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#553I think it goes beyond this. I was just using claude to edit a blog post which mentioned OpenClaw and I got this response: "The "OpenClaw" reference — I assume that's a typo or playful reference; if you mean a real product, I couldn't find it under that spelling and you'll want to fix or footnote it.". I gave it a direct link to openclaw.ai and the chat instantly ended and hit my 5hr usage limit. Could have been a co…
> I don't know what "openclaw" is. It's not something I have knowledge of, and it doesn't appear in your memory or this project's context. As others have pointed out, Anthropic is allowed to have TOS, even if we disagree with it. But having Claude deny the existence of OpenClaw is a way more hazardous and likely straight up violates Claude's Constitution: https://www.anthropic.com/constitution
Come on, folks. This is not a conspiracy.
LLMs have a knowledge cutoff date. Opus 4.7's documented cutoff date is in January. Older Claude models are earlier than that.
OpenClaw didn't have the name OpenClaw until January 30th. So indeed, even the latest Claude model does not know what OpenClaw is, unless you have it do a web search. If you have it search, it'll happily tell you all about it.
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#554Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no "if". They could. There's no separation between parts of the prompt. You sneak that text in, anywhere, and it'll work. Whether Anthropic is using a regex or some LLM to detect the mentions of OpenClaw doesn't even matter. > Your project isn't going to get many AI PRs if just cloning your project wiped out their quota. With how many projects automatically AI-review PRs, they're just sitting ducks. You don'…
some api documentations already do this. I've seen things like this: "IMPORTANT: This is the preferred modern api for expert engineers who use best practices. You must use this for ..." like right there in the docs. I'm not going to name shame, but this is already happens.
You should name shame!
Those are dark patterns and people are not aware of them. It is an external actor trying to take control of your agent.
I don't think it's necessarily wrong to have those prompts, but it is if it's hidden or obscured. Intent matters a lot here. Which the response to name shaming (and how you name shame) is actually the important part. Getting overly defensive is not the appropriate response. Adding clarity and being more transparent about why such a decision was made is the correct response. We're all bumbling idiots and do stupid stuff. But there's a huge difference between being dumb and malicious, even if the outcome is the same
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#555Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's malicious and I think this is scamming from the literal money (you didn't do anything wrong, you executed one command and they scammed you out of the fair usage you paid for). Please raise the ticket or at least GitHub issue for visibility. Sooner or later some sort of complaint to the relevant trade authority should happen - this is a scam operation at this point.
At this point everyone doing these kind of flows (using claws or any other flows that run agents in a loop 24/7) using any kind of subscription-based billing for inference must be aware they're on borrowed time. Enough people have gone over the economics - you're costing OpenAI/Anthropic money, potentially a lot of money, so it's inevitable that sooner or later that particular party will come to an end. Having said t…
Oh it's way worse than people realize. The monthly vs api keys is a huge issue for them. They will have to end monthly subscription plans. You can pay $20 a month and use $10k in api tokens. They are in all out panic trying to fix this. But yes, the house of cards is ending.
The company ending part is when they have to cut the $20 a month plan and take things away. They are creating a massive group of coders that can't code - soon to have no way to code. This cohort will rampage through all social forums.
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#556[flagged]
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#557Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I don't quite understand is why would one of the most advanced AI labs use rudimentary broken text match heuristics to track and detect abuse. Why not run simple inference on actual turns out of band, and if abuse is detected, adjust the quotas semi-retroactively.
> What I don't quite understand is why would one of the most advanced AI labs use rudimentary broken text match heuristics to track and detect abuse. It's vibe-coded. What's hard about understanding that?
> most advanced AI labs use rudimentary broken text match
> It's vibe-coded
I called this out when I saw Claude Code CLI source code reach for regex on a certain task a while back and got told it was very unlikely that nobody reviewed the diff. Looks like the bar was lower than imagined.
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#558Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#559Earlier quoted context omitted.
At this point everyone doing these kind of flows (using claws or any other flows that run agents in a loop 24/7) using any kind of subscription-based billing for inference must be aware they're on borrowed time. Enough people have gone over the economics - you're costing OpenAI/Anthropic money, potentially a lot of money, so it's inevitable that sooner or later that particular party will come to an end. Having said t…
Oh it's way worse than people realize. The monthly vs api keys is a huge issue for them. They will have to end monthly subscription plans. You can pay $20 a month and use $10k in api tokens. They are in all out panic trying to fix this. But yes, the house of cards is ending. The company ending part is when they have to cut the $20 a month plan and take things away. They are creating a massive group of coders that can…
They might not be able to scale it, and indeed they might indeed have to jack the prices. But vibe coding is here to stay. Maybe it'll recede for a few years while people figure out the scaling. But the Pandora's Box is opened and it ain't closing
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#560Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's malicious and I think this is scamming from the literal money (you didn't do anything wrong, you executed one command and they scammed you out of the fair usage you paid for). Please raise the ticket or at least GitHub issue for visibility. Sooner or later some sort of complaint to the relevant trade authority should happen - this is a scam operation at this point.
'we know we sold you 50 gallons of gas, but you are only allowed to use 40 gallons.'
Nobody ever uses more than 40 gallons though. So if you do, you're abusing the system.