Live data from Hacker News

Jack White bans phones at gigs for “100% human experience”

nme.com

541–545 of 545 posts

Re: Jack White bans phones at gigs for “100% human experience”

#541
post #539
post #501

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You've used the word 'deface' throughout this thread and I don't understand it. How is putting a phone in a bag defacing it?

You're making modifications to a physical item. ( http://www.dictionary.com/browse/deface )

But, putting a phone in a bag does not modify the phone.

Re: Jack White bans phones at gigs for “100% human experience”

#542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, during those times when you're "on call" and need to be responsive to such events, you have to make the decision not to go on camping trips or flights or no-phone events like this one. Right?

With kids you are always "on call".

So your position is that with kids at home, you can't be doing things that cause you to be unavailable/unreachable for durations of time longer than some threshold. Nothing wrong with that. The kinds of recreational events that conflict with that restriction are generally easy to spot ahead of time, and no one's compelling you to participate in them.

Re: Jack White bans phones at gigs for “100% human experience”

#543
post #63

So is clapping part of the agreement when I go to a gig? Why is it wasting time playing to people who don't clap. Is he doing it for the claps? Why do I have to pay then? Can I pay extra to get a ticket which allows me not to clap? You can't clap with just a drink in your hand either, will he be banning drinking at his gigs? Is he using amplifiers or are they banned as part of this "human experience" too? I hate phon…

You're trying too hard to find problems. I'm guessing White would be okay if you stayed home.

I'd just like a bit more precision and perhaps more honesty. He says it's about being a more human experience but I don't know what that means and he makes no effort to explain it clearly, instead muddying the waters.

I have a similar problem with people who dress up their criticism of other's behaviour as something "moral".

Re: Jack White bans phones at gigs for “100% human experience”

#544
post #63

So is clapping part of the agreement when I go to a gig? Why is it wasting time playing to people who don't clap. Is he doing it for the claps? Why do I have to pay then? Can I pay extra to get a ticket which allows me not to clap? You can't clap with just a drink in your hand either, will he be banning drinking at his gigs? Is he using amplifiers or are they banned as part of this "human experience" too? I hate phon…

I think you're taking that statement a bit too far toward its logical conclusion.

I did it to mock his justification of his ban, which isn't at all clear. Wish he'd just say "I've banned phoned because I don't like them". Fine by me, I don't like them either.

Re: Jack White bans phones at gigs for “100% human experience”

#545
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the viscerality of this response is fascinating. Putting your phone in a case is a "prison", and you must check it every time you go to the toilet, and you're concerned about a terrorist attack -- enough to want your phone, but not enough to stay home, as if your apps could somehow save you. > Treat people like adults. If they break the rules, ask them to leave. Isn't that what we've been trying for the past…

Don't be ridiculous. Fear of terrorism is not the only factor. Cellphones are one of the past century's greatest contributions to public safety. If you want to be antagonistic about the threat of a bombing, how about a more commonplace example: you're a very drunk young girl who's been separated from her friends at the concert and a pushy, aggressive guy you don't know is trying to get you into his car to go home wit…

But you have a choice. Just don't go to the show. If you think 2 hours without your phone puts your life at risk, simply do not put yourself in these dangerous situations. Let other people enjoy the experience.
Post reply on HN