Earlier quoted context omitted.
We moved house recently and I bought some new knives for the kitchen. My wife is now constantly cutting herself because she has no intuition for how sharp a knife should be. I can’t really imagine what the safety argument is against dull knives.
A knife which cannot cut anything isn’t a knife? It sounds like she literally has no idea how to use a knife. Is she doesn’t want a knife which can cut things, Butter ‘knives’ are probably more her speed? What was she even using the ‘knife’ for before if it couldn’t even cut her? Spreading jelly? Slicing cakes? Not to be snarky, but it’s possible a couples class which covers things like how to use a knife safely migh…
Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
521–530 of 697 posts
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#522Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know I'm setting myself up for being picked up, but... I use an older knife that I've never sharpened outside of "occasionally" running it back and forth against a tough fabric. It cuts literally everything just fine; cucumbers, tomatoes, potatoes, etc. Nothing about my use of it _seems_ unsafe; but I expect that's partially because I don't cut very fast. Cooking, when I'm involved, tends to be "social time", where…
We moved house recently and I bought some new knives for the kitchen. My wife is now constantly cutting herself because she has no intuition for how sharp a knife should be. I can’t really imagine what the safety argument is against dull knives.
But - if the knife slips and a large force is applied at the same time - then you will get a large cut.
If the knife slips and a small force is applied, you will get a smaller cut.
If the probability of slipping is the same for sharp and dull knifes, then due to the forces applied, the cuts you get with a sharp knife are less dangerous.
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#523Why is it people here seem so unusually sceptical? It's expensive (but not really, only compared to knives - a $500 GPU isn't expensive). It's probably mostly good in certain niches and using a $10 knife that's sharpened properly is probably 95% as good in almost every application, and using a $10 knife that is only reasonably well sharpened is probably 90% as good. Slicing stuff for hotpot or yakiniku or Korean BBQ…
I think it's because it seems like a Juicero to anyone who uses knives to make dinner regularly. We're fascinated by tech, and sure, I'd try this, but I bet anyone who has prepped with a knife for hours per week is probably pretty skeptical on the practicality here. A sharpened piece of metal has been reliable for thousands of years and will continue to remain so. For new tech, I am also a fan of the ceramic knives o…
O.o
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#524Earlier quoted context omitted.
We moved house recently and I bought some new knives for the kitchen. My wife is now constantly cutting herself because she has no intuition for how sharp a knife should be. I can’t really imagine what the safety argument is against dull knives.
Maybe there's some bell curve of knife skills proficiency where the better you are with knives, the safer they are when sharp, but generally: Dull knives are more likely to slip on whatever you're cutting (and cut you instead). They're also more likely to need more force when cutting which means less control.
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#525Earlier quoted context omitted.
just want to point out that maintaining a knife is a whole hobby that requires a time investment of learning the skill and storage of additional tools and materials. i'm surprised at all the apparent knife enthusiast posts trashing this device. I take my victorinox (which is absolutely nothing special and surprises me that it costs $60+ dollars) to the farmers market for sharpening but sharpness isn't even the proble…
> just want to point out that maintaining a knife is a whole hobby that requires a time investment of learning the skill and storage of additional tools and material. You're right that's a hobby. But the hobby's definition of "proper maintenance" and what it "requires" is basically just people nerding out about things that don't matter the slightest in the real world. To maintain a kitchen knife so that it cuts a tom…
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#526Earlier quoted context omitted.
Duller knives cut more slowly, hence if I cut my finger, I feel it before it goes deeper, which is safer. Such knife seems like a disaster waiting to happen, I can't see the benefit honestly.
I've seen chefs arguing the other way around. You have to apply more pressure when using duller knives, this means less control and less safety.
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#527What happens when you “oops”? All the way through the bone?
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#528Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe there's some bell curve of knife skills proficiency where the better you are with knives, the safer they are when sharp, but generally: Dull knives are more likely to slip on whatever you're cutting (and cut you instead). They're also more likely to need more force when cutting which means less control.
People say this a lot but the dull knives I have won’t cut my hands around the force required to cut, say, veg. My sharp knife will cut my hand at extremely low levels of force. Also the direction the dull knives can slip is usually along the surface of what I’m cutting which would almost always be away from my hand.
The knives I consider dull will absolutely cut me if I do something dumb, and I'm much less likely to do something dumb when the blade goes straight through what I'm cutting without having to use any force.
I guess it also depends how and what you're cutting. I sure wouldn't try to julienne carrots with a knife that doesn't easily slice through the carrot.
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#529BTW I think the focus on knife sharpness is overrated for most kitchen tasks. At least for home cooks. Your knives should just have the necessary sharpness. More than that is a negative in my opinion.
Re: Ultrasonic Chef's Knife
#530Earlier quoted context omitted.
E-waste can be solved without reducing the number of items. Just requires basic investments in recycling.
Recycling is a sham. There is mostly no efficient recycling of sufficiently advanced components, the industry just spent decades on making you think you can buy lots of cheap things and all that trash isn’t your problem. Well it is.
“Recycling” as mentioned by the US press is a scam because we had humans walking over our trash in India manually recycling in such a dangerous way they banned our recycling.
Anything can be ground into dust and sent through a series of physiochemical processes to reconstitute.