Live data from Hacker News

Apple Mac Studio

apple.com

521–530 of 734 posts

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#521

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tell the game developers! They need to hear from you that the demand is there.

Has everybody forgotten about Apple Arcade? It has all the hits like Angry Birds and Fruit Ninja!

Apple Arcade actually has some great stuff. Even all the rebadged "+" games are much improved since Apple forbids IAP in Arcade. The game play loops have been redesigned to actually be fun. Thumper+, Winding Worlds, and What the Golf are some of my favorites.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#522

This is such a random thing to complain about but I hate these Mac product pages with the animations as you scroll. I guess they are designed for mobile but I navigate them on a desktop using a mouse wheel and they always look super clunky.

If you're using Chrome, change the page zoom from 100% to 33% or 50%. It feels so much more normal (to me)

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#523

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My jaw hit the floor when I saw USB A ports. If only it had multiple HDMI ...

> My jaw hit the floor when I saw USB A ports. Don‘t forget the headphone jack!

I don't think there are any Macs that don't have a headphone jack, with the possible exception of the Mac Pro.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#524
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This. So much this. Getting what we need not what Jony says we needed.

Jony contributed what he could. I think Apple is better off for having had him for a period of time, but that time has passed.

That time passed 5+ years before he actually left. I will forever look at the 2016 MBP and remember his legacy.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#525
post #103
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doing some quick searching around. I know there is Crossover, Wine technically works on Mac from what I can tell also. So not sure if there is a technical reason Proton couldn't work on Mac other than just not building it. Apple does talk a lot about gaming now on the iPhone and iPad, I would love to see them talk about it more on Mac (especially with how powerful these are) and maybe work with Proton like Steam is f…

Crossover is proprietary. Pure Wine cannot run x86 apps on ARM if I understand correctly.

It can't, but if you use Linux and binfmt_misc, you can set it up so that x86 Windows apps run seamlessly on ARM.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#527

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because nobody outside hardcore computer nerds wants a beige box tower with 14 drive bays sitting on their desk. People want quite little boxes that gets work done without having to have dedicated room for loud machines.

There is plenty of room for a second HDMI port (or mini DP) especially if they went to a vertical configuration for HDMI.

Why miniDP? Just use the DisplayPort side channel that already exists in USB-C connectors; you can buy inexpensive USB-C-to-DP cables.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#528

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My workstation build with Epyc is ~$5,000 and has more cores (24 core), more memory (256 GB), faster GPU (3090), a 2TB pcie 4 SSD and I suspect will perform better on standard benchmarks. Definitely not as compact as the Studio though but lot more extendable.

> I suspect will perform better on standard benchmarks. I wouldn't be so sure about that. These M1 chips have some crazy benchmark performance. What they don't have, is a standard x86 ISA, which means that a lot of applications run emulated (and still tend to beat many Intel specs, anyway). I keep reading people complaining that "It's faster, but not that much faster. What's the big deal?", when they are talking abou…

Geekbench scores came out, The Epyc 7443p scored 27461, M1 Ultra scored 24055 on multi-core. Geekbench uses ARM-native for Mac M1 iirc.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#529

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is plenty of room for a second HDMI port (or mini DP) especially if they went to a vertical configuration for HDMI.

So your opinion is that you want it. My opinion is I don't. HDMI is much more limiting. Say that you're a manufacturer trying to keep an eye towards wants new vs supporting what's old, what decisions do you make to support new and retro without increasing the costs? At some point, having backseat decision makers giving input results in the car designed by Homer. Of all of the things I've personally railed on Apple ab…

If there were two HDMI ports, how would that impact your one-HDMI world? It's clear from the comments others would find it useful. So that's a valid compromise. It's on the back of the unit so you wouldn't have to stare at that second unused port and shudder in disgust.

> trying to keep an eye towards wants new vs supporting what's old

No one is suggesting they trade anything away. Apple has settled on USB-C. But there's plenty of extra room on the rear panel. Your argument assumes benevolence on Apple's part. For all you know the chips support dual HDMI, they removed it to save money which ends up being pure profit because they didn't reduce the product price at all. Do you think adding a second HDMI would increase the arbitrary price from $2k to $2k plus $20?

For the record, I would LOVE it if the Mac startup chime played "La Cucaracha"

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#530

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If people listened to that advice Apple's stock price would be cut in half. 99% of Mac users can get along fine with the base m1 models.

pretty sure apple lives and dies by their iPhone sales. Sure, they sell a ton of computers, but it's nothing compared to their phone revenue. I wouldn't be surprised if there were activist investors who think they should drop the personal computer/laptop product lineup entirely

This would likely also affect their iPhone sales, so pretty bad plan.
Post reply on HN