Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Tmux 2.0 released

sourceforge.net

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 221 posts

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#51

Post by andyl »

vampirechicken wrote: post #29
andyl wrote: post #12

I'm looking forward to the combination of Tmux and Neovim. Both (will) support detached/shared sessions, both are scriptable/configurable, both can be driven by a remote process. I believe with Tmux and Neovim you could put together anything from a simple test/editing environment to a full-blown IDE.

But you can already script vim...

Yeah but - I like Neovim's msgpack-api, and the built-in terminal emulation. On the Neovim roadmap: attach/detach from a background session, multiple screens with different sizes.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#52

Post by amjith »

jbnicolai wrote: post #15

For those who are just getting started with tmux: I advise looking around others' .tmux.conf files for some sensible settings. Like Vim, Tmux ships with a lot of powerful features disabled by default. My absolute favorite has to be binding a hotkey to opening URLs in the current window [0]. See [1] for a small demo I just recorded. To get started, here's my current config: [1] [0]: https://github.com/jbnicolai/tmux/b…

Zoom/Unzoom is now part of default tmux.

z

So you can remove this line from your config:

https://github.com/jbnicolai/tmux/blob/master/.tmux.conf#L98

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#53

Post by adamrt »

jkyle wrote: post #40
GrantSolar wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it's how 99% of websites get their funding, allowing them to survive. Why have an adblocker installed when you can avoid the sites with obnoxious adverts?

Sometimes I have to get useful tools from them....like tmux. As to why I use Adblock, I've never. Not once. Ever. Bought anything from an ad on a website. I _have_ bought books and such from the referral links on blogs (which adblock doesn't block). The reason I use adblock is because I'm not the demographic ads on websites are targeting. So websites aren't losing any revenue by me not seeing their ads.

That's now how ads always work. Many sites get revenue based on impressions, not clicks or conversions.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#54

Post by thedaemon »

jkyle wrote: post #49
Jaepa wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You use ctl+s as your bind?

I use ctrl+s on my local config and I use ctrl+a on my remote tmux.conf's. That way I can attach to a remote tmux in a local session and not produce a terminal muxing singularity that swallows worlds.

I made the mistake of having the same hotkey once. I can verify the existence of said singularity.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#55

Post by PeterUstinox »

jkyle wrote: post #40
GrantSolar wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it's how 99% of websites get their funding, allowing them to survive. Why have an adblocker installed when you can avoid the sites with obnoxious adverts?

Sometimes I have to get useful tools from them....like tmux. As to why I use Adblock, I've never. Not once. Ever. Bought anything from an ad on a website. I _have_ bought books and such from the referral links on blogs (which adblock doesn't block). The reason I use adblock is because I'm not the demographic ads on websites are targeting. So websites aren't losing any revenue by me not seeing their ads.

Of course they lose revenue. your view is like any other. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_impression) you won't be taking money from the company, which started the ad campaign. also: don't underestimate the effects on brand value, which will come subconsciously, if you look at ads. You will know certain companies are still active etc. This is why you don't necessarily need to be targeted. simply informed.

The "sometimes" you talk about should just be with ads on. it won't hurt much, because it's just sometimes.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#56

Post by olalonde »

kkthegamer wrote: post #43
bluehex wrote: post #6

It makes me sad to see a respectable piece of open source software hosted on this site with its intrusive advertising practices such as ads with fake "install" buttons on the download page. What is the advantage of using Sourceforge these days when github and bitbucket are free for open source?

SourceForge itself is free software. I think that's one possible reason to use it rather than GitHub or else. The other possible is that SourceForge provide mailing list server and other service for projects. Anyway, you won't move a project around unless you have some strong motivations.

Is SourceForge really open source? Guess I must have missed that news. Regardless, Gitlab would still be a better choice in terms of UX and is also open source.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#57

Post by GrantSolar »

jkyle wrote: post #40
GrantSolar wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it's how 99% of websites get their funding, allowing them to survive. Why have an adblocker installed when you can avoid the sites with obnoxious adverts?

Sometimes I have to get useful tools from them....like tmux. As to why I use Adblock, I've never. Not once. Ever. Bought anything from an ad on a website. I _have_ bought books and such from the referral links on blogs (which adblock doesn't block). The reason I use adblock is because I'm not the demographic ads on websites are targeting. So websites aren't losing any revenue by me not seeing their ads.

Adverts are not just about getting a click to follow through to a purchase.

What do you gain by blocking adverts? An extra 150K from your data plan?

>websites aren't losing any revenue by me not seeing their ads.

This argument is a little too close to justifying piracy for my liking. "I wasn't going to buy it anyway, so it's fine"

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#58

Post by micampe »

agumonkey wrote: post #32

I use tmux all the time, but I've read about dtach/dvtm. http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/#why Anyone using that instead ?

I use dtach because detaching from the terminal is the only feature I would use in tmux.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#59

Post by rylee »

Jaepa wrote: post #19
jbnicolai wrote: post #15

For those who are just getting started with tmux: I advise looking around others' .tmux.conf files for some sensible settings. Like Vim, Tmux ships with a lot of powerful features disabled by default. My absolute favorite has to be binding a hotkey to opening URLs in the current window [0]. See [1] for a small demo I just recorded. To get started, here's my current config: [1] [0]: https://github.com/jbnicolai/tmux/b…

You use ctl+s as your bind?

Consider using . I recently switched and it's made a world of difference to my speed.

Re: Tmux 2.0 released

#60

Post by andyl »

catern wrote: post #39
andyl wrote: post #12

I'm looking forward to the combination of Tmux and Neovim. Both (will) support detached/shared sessions, both are scriptable/configurable, both can be driven by a remote process. I believe with Tmux and Neovim you could put together anything from a simple test/editing environment to a full-blown IDE.

Well, no need to really look forward... You already have every one of those capabilities with Emacs. >you could put together anything from a simple test/editing environment to a full-blown IDE. People already do this with Emacs.

Emacs is great and I know lots of people who love evil mode. I prefer vim because it comes pre-installed - good for ops. Many of my tools have embedded Lua, so it's great that I can exercise my Lua skills with Neovim. None of my other tools embeds elisp, so for me, elisp is a dead-end.
Post reply on HN