I'm excited by the improvements in the pane navigation. I'd have to try it out to get the feel of it but looks like an improvement.
Tmux 2.0 released
31–40 of 221 posts
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#32I use tmux all the time, but I've read about dtach/dvtm.
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/#why
Anyone using that instead ?
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#33The release notes don't say: Is this a session-breaking update? I'd hate to run the update only to have it kill my current TMUX session. Devs - if you're reading this: PLEASE indicate if I could update without restarting the session.
Does not appear to be a session-breaking update. I just updated with no ill effects.
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do. It's closer to the prefix/leader I was used to when using screen ( ), and I find it easier to type.
Why not use C-a?
I also use C-s on my local machine because:
1. I can still use C-a with readline (go to first character)
2. If I ssh and then use screen, I can use C-a to navigate my remote screen and C-s to navigate my local tmux.
3. C-s is closer to C-a then other letters on my keyboard.
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#35Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you sure you don't have any ad blocker installed?
A reasonable followup question why wouldn't one have an ad blocker installed?
Because it's how 99% of websites get their funding, allowing them to survive. Why have an adblocker installed when you can avoid the sites with obnoxious adverts?
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#37I use tmux all the time, but I've read about dtach/dvtm. http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/#why Anyone using that instead ?
I'm using dvtm, after trying screen and tmux in the past. No particular reason other than it's Xmonad-like layout switching.
It's crashed once, in a few months of usage. Make of that what you will.
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#38Does anyone else wish tmux were modal like vim, ie. without a "leader" key? My conf file has a ton of custom key bindings for window / pane management, and I'd love for them to go away or become simplified by simply dropping into a "window management mode". Likewise, I'd like the command mode to stay open until I close it. I have some scripted hacks to do this, but it's nowhere near what I'd expect from true modality.
One of these days I guess I could get around to writing a patch. This single feature is probably my most wanted for any software at the moment.
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#39I'm looking forward to the combination of Tmux and Neovim. Both (will) support detached/shared sessions, both are scriptable/configurable, both can be driven by a remote process. I believe with Tmux and Neovim you could put together anything from a simple test/editing environment to a full-blown IDE.
Well, no need to really look forward... You already have every one of those capabilities with Emacs.
>you could put together anything from a simple test/editing environment to a full-blown IDE.
People already do this with Emacs.
Re: Tmux 2.0 released
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
A reasonable followup question why wouldn't one have an ad blocker installed?
Because it's how 99% of websites get their funding, allowing them to survive. Why have an adblocker installed when you can avoid the sites with obnoxious adverts?
Sometimes I have to get useful tools from them....like tmux.
As to why I use Adblock, I've never. Not once. Ever. Bought anything from an ad on a website. I _have_ bought books and such from the referral links on blogs (which adblock doesn't block).
The reason I use adblock is because I'm not the demographic ads on websites are targeting. So websites aren't losing any revenue by me not seeing their ads.