Earlier quoted context omitted.
Keep in mind that evolution works primarily at a subspecies level, so any mutations which benefited that lineage at the expense of the species as a whole would tend to be favored.
Actually, evolution is almost entirely dominated by selection at the individual level, with a modicum of kin selection thrown in. The notion that selection acts at other levels is highly speculative (I wrote a novel based on the idea, but it's the purest kind of speculative fiction: http://www.amazon.com/Darwins-Theorem-TJ-Radcliffe-ebook/dp/... )
Telomere extension turns back aging clock in cultured human cells, study finds
51–53 of 53 posts
Re: Telomere extension turns back aging clock in cultured human cells, study finds
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't want a backup; I want RAID. The existence of a copy of a person does not preserve the continuity of the original.
> The existence of a copy of a person does not preserve the continuity of the original. Amazing how many people forget this simple fact.
Re: Telomere extension turns back aging clock in cultured human cells, study finds
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're misreading the statistics a bit. The biggest gains in life expectancy have been at birth. There have been old people for a lot longer than the last 150 years. Even Aristotle knew about menopause. And Plato lived to be 80.
You have to remember a significant time in human evolutionary scale is probably something like 10k-100k years. Looking at wiki page for life expectacy at the Paleolithic [1] (even at 15 years) shows it lines right up with woman menopause. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy