"this may spark a revolution in electronics as significant as the invention of the transistor, vacuum tube, and induction motor." How, exactly?
Maglev trains, fusion power plants, fanless super computers in your pocket that charge in a minute and don't get hot. Basically utopia.
Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
51–60 of 362 posts
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#52I am going to attempt to address the common nitpicks in one fell swoop: 1. Rushed publication, plot quality, grammar, etc. Get over yourselves. This is a pre-print for an instant-Nobel, next-tier-of-civilization level discovery. The proper publication will come in due time. Waiting for a more complete verification is a sheltered view. Being first matters. Things changed after the J/Psi discovery in 1974. For those th…
Edited to add: I am not a physicist. I don't know the subtleties of measuring experiments, and it was not my intention to state that there was a measurement error. I just wanted to ask someone for their assessment of the chances it was an error.
It's a little depressing that people are so quick to assume the worst of others, but I get why. The online flamewars fought over every announcement of this type would definitely put people on guard. Heck, on the UAP thread yesterday I immediately leapt to snarking about extraordinary announcements being bogus and I feel bad that I probably attacked it for no reason other than to feel cool: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36886221
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this guy posting anywhere besides Twitter (or... X)? I can't view without an account.
LOL they really renamed it X? I see they even bought x.com which surely they paid some ridiculous amount for, and yet they wasn’t able to spend any cent on original logo, at least X.org logo as an orange O.
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Someone posted a ChatGPT answer, which seems a pretty good response: Energy Efficiency: Superconductors conduct electricity without resistance, which means they don't produce heat as a byproduct. This could make electronic devices more energy-efficient and help them run cooler, which could extend battery life in mobile devices and potentially reduce the need for cooling in larger devices like computers. Processing Sp…
So basically 'more efficient'? I'd dispute the 'dramatically' more efficient power grids, unless that's couched in industry terms - ie a 10% reduction in transmission losses might be 'dramatic' for energy grid engineers. But not really world-changing, for the rest of us. "Aerospace and Defense: Superconductors could be used in a variety of aerospace and defense applications, such as advanced radar systems, satellite…
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#55A source (German) attributed to the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research thinks the paper is bogus [0] [0] https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=9a3f8740
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#56A source (German) attributed to the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research thinks the paper is bogus [0] [0] https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=9a3f8740
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#57Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#58"this may spark a revolution in electronics as significant as the invention of the transistor, vacuum tube, and induction motor." How, exactly?
More destructive weapons. Of course I am being cynical, but that will certainly be one of the outcomes.
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this guy posting anywhere besides Twitter (or... X)? I can't view without an account.
LOL they really renamed it X? I see they even bought x.com which surely they paid some ridiculous amount for, and yet they wasn’t able to spend any cent on original logo, at least X.org logo as an orange O.
We'll have to wait and see if such a move is a good one...
Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this guy posting anywhere besides Twitter (or... X)? I can't view without an account.
LOL they really renamed it X? I see they even bought x.com which surely they paid some ridiculous amount for, and yet they wasn’t able to spend any cent on original logo, at least X.org logo as an orange O.
[1]: https://domaininvesting.com/elon-musk-acquires-x-com-domain/