Live data from Hacker News

Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

scanalyst.fourmilab.ch

51–60 of 362 posts

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#51
post #11
post #6

"this may spark a revolution in electronics as significant as the invention of the transistor, vacuum tube, and induction motor." How, exactly?

Maglev trains, fusion power plants, fanless super computers in your pocket that charge in a minute and don't get hot. Basically utopia.

While these are all cool applications, I can perfectly see them used in the most awful dystopian world imaginable.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#52

I am going to attempt to address the common nitpicks in one fell swoop: 1. Rushed publication, plot quality, grammar, etc. Get over yourselves. This is a pre-print for an instant-Nobel, next-tier-of-civilization level discovery. The proper publication will come in due time. Waiting for a more complete verification is a sheltered view. Being first matters. Things changed after the J/Psi discovery in 1974. For those th…

What do you think the chances are of it being a measurement/instruments error?

Edited to add: I am not a physicist. I don't know the subtleties of measuring experiments, and it was not my intention to state that there was a measurement error. I just wanted to ask someone for their assessment of the chances it was an error.

It's a little depressing that people are so quick to assume the worst of others, but I get why. The online flamewars fought over every announcement of this type would definitely put people on guard. Heck, on the UAP thread yesterday I immediately leapt to snarking about extraordinary announcements being bogus and I feel bad that I probably attacked it for no reason other than to feel cool: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36886221

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#53
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this guy posting anywhere besides Twitter (or... X)? I can't view without an account.

LOL they really renamed it X? I see they even bought x.com which surely they paid some ridiculous amount for, and yet they wasn’t able to spend any cent on original logo, at least X.org logo as an orange O.

Elon has personally owned x.com for a number of years now. Timeline as I remember it is Elon bought it in the late 90's, it changed hands when paypal merged with Elon's payment company, then he bought it back in 2017ish

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#54
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone posted a ChatGPT answer, which seems a pretty good response: Energy Efficiency: Superconductors conduct electricity without resistance, which means they don't produce heat as a byproduct. This could make electronic devices more energy-efficient and help them run cooler, which could extend battery life in mobile devices and potentially reduce the need for cooling in larger devices like computers. Processing Sp…

So basically 'more efficient'? I'd dispute the 'dramatically' more efficient power grids, unless that's couched in industry terms - ie a 10% reduction in transmission losses might be 'dramatic' for energy grid engineers. But not really world-changing, for the rest of us. "Aerospace and Defense: Superconductors could be used in a variety of aerospace and defense applications, such as advanced radar systems, satellite…

Faster, better, cheaper, and a lot of it.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#55
post #28

A source (German) attributed to the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research thinks the paper is bogus [0] [0] https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=9a3f8740

For context, Fefe is a rather famous German hacker and his blog serves as rumor mill for German nerds. So on one hand I wouldn't trust it that much, on the other hand it is precisely where I would expect knowledgeable people ranting about a bad paper anonymously. (And what they are saying sounds like the type of thing domain experts would pay attention to.)

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#56
post #28

A source (German) attributed to the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research thinks the paper is bogus [0] [0] https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=9a3f8740

"It should look like this" - until these guys made a scientific discovery and now it looks like this other different never before seen graph. This is hardly a proper rebuttal, expert opinion or not. We need these gents to try to replicate the results and then chime in. Otherwise it's just some dudes opinion. At one point the Earth was considered the center of our solar system.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Q: Das Layout sieht Scheiße aus! A: Jo, das ist das historische Default-Layout. solid.

My German is poor. Does this say: Q: The layout is very shitty! A: No, it’s the historically default layout.

Jo translates more to Yes or Yeah

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#58
post #23
post #6

"this may spark a revolution in electronics as significant as the invention of the transistor, vacuum tube, and induction motor." How, exactly?

More destructive weapons. Of course I am being cynical, but that will certainly be one of the outcomes.

I thought there was something about waste heat being a problem in outer space, so if this fixes that it could open the door for space-based laser weapons and other terrible things. GDI Ion Cannon when?

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#59
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this guy posting anywhere besides Twitter (or... X)? I can't view without an account.

LOL they really renamed it X? I see they even bought x.com which surely they paid some ridiculous amount for, and yet they wasn’t able to spend any cent on original logo, at least X.org logo as an orange O.

Using a unicode character might have been deliberate. It lets anyone stick your logo on a post on another platform. Allows viral marketing even in places where posting an image is high friction and/or where hyperlinks are banned.

We'll have to wait and see if such a move is a good one...

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#60
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this guy posting anywhere besides Twitter (or... X)? I can't view without an account.

LOL they really renamed it X? I see they even bought x.com which surely they paid some ridiculous amount for, and yet they wasn’t able to spend any cent on original logo, at least X.org logo as an orange O.

Musk has owned the X.com domain since at least 2017. [1] And even that was buying it back from PayPal. X.com was an online bank co-founded by Musk in 1999 which was later on merged into PayPal. [2]

[1]: https://domaininvesting.com/elon-musk-acquires-x-com-domain/

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.com

Post reply on HN