Earlier quoted context omitted.
Regardless of what actually happened today, the high level was absolutely deliberate, it is just basic dam maintenance to let more water out when it fills. And that was absolutely reckless, contributing to certain deaths today. Of course, if you are planning on blowing the dam, that makes sense for maximum damage, but I speculate.
Maybe forcing a mechanical failure provides more plausible deniability than simply blowing it up? It also makes it easier to repair considering it's still a valuable source of water for Crimea.
The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
51–60 of 347 posts
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#52Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nova-kakhovka-dam-khers... Simulation of worst-case scenarios: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tRYWbVD5AE The Russian State News agency claims that the dam "collapsed due to damage" https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/166592960325106892... Ukraine says it was destroyed by the Russian military. Google maps: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Kakhovka+Hydroelectric+Po…
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#53I we focus on the largest nuclear power plant in Europe for a minute. Are all reactors completely shut off? Is there any danger of meltdown?
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ukraine just started counterattack so this effectively blocks attack through Kherson region.
Following some of the threads, there's satellite evidence it may have just failed for mechanical reasons. If this was unintentional and they didn't abandon those positions downstream they're in for a bad time.
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Regardless of what actually happened today, the high level was absolutely deliberate, it is just basic dam maintenance to let more water out when it fills. And that was absolutely reckless, contributing to certain deaths today. Of course, if you are planning on blowing the dam, that makes sense for maximum damage, but I speculate.
Maybe forcing a mechanical failure provides more plausible deniability than simply blowing it up? It also makes it easier to repair considering it's still a valuable source of water for Crimea.
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you have a credible source that goes into detail on that, I'd appreciate it.
There's no significant drinking water source in Crimea. And this was the dam directing water to Crimean water channel. Not sure what other credible source you may want.
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#57This article currently has much more information (as of the time of posting) https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/06/russia-uk... ( "Russia-Ukraine war live: dam near Kherson destroyed by Russian forces, says Ukraine, sparking evacuations" )
[flagged]
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#58This article currently has much more information (as of the time of posting) https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/06/russia-uk... ( "Russia-Ukraine war live: dam near Kherson destroyed by Russian forces, says Ukraine, sparking evacuations" )
[flagged]
No need for game: if Russia did not invade, this would not happen.
Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#59Re: The Nova Kakhovka Hydroelectric dam in Ukraine has been blown open
#60I we focus on the largest nuclear power plant in Europe for a minute. Are all reactors completely shut off? Is there any danger of meltdown?
Reactors have been shut down for about half a year. So the hard part is over but they still need quite a bit of water.
> "Water from the Kakhovsky Reservoir is necessary for the station to receive power for turbine capacitors and safety systems of the ZNPP. The station's cooling pond is now full: as of 8:00 a.m., the water level is 16.6 meters, which is sufficient for the station's needs."
Source: https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/166595989648168550...