Live data from Hacker News

Jazz Is Freedom

thebaffler.com

51–60 of 65 posts

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#51
post #40

I highly recommend this Vox explainer on John Coltrane's "Giant Steps", for anyone interested in learning about the math behind one of Jazz' greatest innovations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62tIvfP9A2w

It’s still used to torture music students to this very day!

I don't know what you mean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oPb6D5ZT7Y

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#52
post #9

In one sense jazz is all about freedom - you can play "whatever you want!"- but in many other senses it's as incredibly traditional and formulaic.as classical. There is a canon of songs that is worshipped, and song structures and instrument combos are mostly frozen in amber, and there are lines you just cannot cross. Every genre gets like that after awhile I guess.

Yes, that's the inherent tension within jazz. It's pure freedom, but it's also inseparable from its history, the people who play it today, and even the audience. Disclosure: I'm a performing jazz bassist. I'm at a level where I can collaborate with bands, but am not good enough to blaze my own path, except to the extent of having a playing style of my own. The canon of tunes, and the "standard arrangement" are both a…

The standard arrangement -- it enables you to put together a group of players who've never worked together to play tunes nobody has even heard before, but then it just sounds like every other jazz band.

I'd love to hear your various groups, and am always up for a long bass solo -- I switched from trumpet to bass in college. I don't know if it's possible but it'd be awesome to mix up all of those styles into a single performance!

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#53
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've seen acceptance of all kinds of avant-garde music here but the one genre that repeatedly gets called out as perhaps not fitting the requirements for qualifying as music is rap. Couldn't help think of that with your description. It's too bad because even with endless repetition and copying it's a genre that continues to innovate every year, eg Playboi Carti who is among the most popular yet works in the realm of…

Where current popular music (I would call it EDM) is pushing the sound more than the song, rap is obviously about the words. Maybe hence the schism in the value of rap in music.

my example, carti, is much more about the sound and feeling as it is the words. people who require rap to have so-called elevated/intelligent lyrics are most challenged by his music and seem stuck in older ideas of what it ought to be

the criticism i read most often here is that rap lacks melody as a requirement of music - two absurd ideas

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#54
post #29

At every moment in history there were artists moving the boundaries of what was considered music. Every so often, a near past style was frozen and called a genre, you could call it a major version. Once the jazz as most people know it was part of a movement pushing those boundaries, but so was debussy, chopin, or almost any other composer. Now, this jazz has little freedom and has more in common with classical music,…

I've seen acceptance of all kinds of avant-garde music here but the one genre that repeatedly gets called out as perhaps not fitting the requirements for qualifying as music is rap. Couldn't help think of that with your description. It's too bad because even with endless repetition and copying it's a genre that continues to innovate every year, eg Playboi Carti who is among the most popular yet works in the realm of…

> the one genre that repeatedly gets called out as perhaps not fitting the requirements for qualifying as music is rap.

holy crap, where are you seeing this happen? I haven't encountered that kind of thing since literally the 1990s. possibly even the 80s.

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#55
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Miles did some nice synthesizer stuff as well. And he said he would never go back to be-bob it was all done already.

I remember watching a documentary about Miles right before he released Tutu. The interviewer asked if he ever got nostalgic for the old bebop or cool jazz stuff he used to play. Miles paused for a long time, then he said I love those old tunes but they're in the past and I can't go back there. I got to keep moving. I really respected him for that, but when I got to college the music program was so focused on the past…

one of my favorite tidbits from the Miles book is when he says he's obviously proud of Kind Of Blue, but that he didn't quite manage to get the sound he had in his head. if i recall, he said he was trying to go for the vibe of an african thumb piano.

i think about this all the time. it's like a koan.

good on you for breaking with the orthodoxy. or as miles might call them "non-playing motherfuckers"

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#56
post #9

In one sense jazz is all about freedom - you can play "whatever you want!"- but in many other senses it's as incredibly traditional and formulaic.as classical. There is a canon of songs that is worshipped, and song structures and instrument combos are mostly frozen in amber, and there are lines you just cannot cross. Every genre gets like that after awhile I guess.

Jazz education is a blessing and a curse. Most high level high school programs are focused on the Essentially Ellington competition, meaning that they learn to swing, to play with humanity and emotion, and to blend together. All good things, and I do believe that Ellington is the greatest American composer period. But it appears learning an 80+ year old style usually is not a gateway to discovering the modern day equ…

Thanks for those recommendations! Yep, I didn't make it past early college music classes, which just weren't doing it for me. I got booed out of the room once for suggesting it'd be cool to mix jazz and hip-hop (in 1989). Probably should have gone some place like Berklee but I didn't see that path at the time.

I recently discovered multi-instrumentalist Robert Stillman, who opened for The Smile (Thom Yorke and Jonny Greenwood's side project with Tom Skinner). He played solo tenor saxophone with some kind of looping effect, along with some lo-fi sampling involving multiple lightly-synchronized cassette tapes of himself playing other instruments. Amazing stuff.

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#57
post #29

At every moment in history there were artists moving the boundaries of what was considered music. Every so often, a near past style was frozen and called a genre, you could call it a major version. Once the jazz as most people know it was part of a movement pushing those boundaries, but so was debussy, chopin, or almost any other composer. Now, this jazz has little freedom and has more in common with classical music,…

It's why I have tremendous respect for bands like King Crimson. You could tell their 1969 debut album has very heavy jazz influences. They've disbanded and re-birthed themselves about a dozen times since then, each time with a new line-up and both a fresh take on new compositions, and re-imagining of the old stuff.

Last time they were active was 2021, but at this point I'm sure they'll play again.

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#58
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've seen acceptance of all kinds of avant-garde music here but the one genre that repeatedly gets called out as perhaps not fitting the requirements for qualifying as music is rap. Couldn't help think of that with your description. It's too bad because even with endless repetition and copying it's a genre that continues to innovate every year, eg Playboi Carti who is among the most popular yet works in the realm of…

Where current popular music (I would call it EDM) is pushing the sound more than the song, rap is obviously about the words. Maybe hence the schism in the value of rap in music.

That is not an educated or reasonable conclusion, and not just because rappers artists use their voice as a (tuned) instrument.

There's countless examples of rappers incorporating, collaborating with and evolving every genre. One of my favs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZTYgq4EoRo

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#59
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where current popular music (I would call it EDM) is pushing the sound more than the song, rap is obviously about the words. Maybe hence the schism in the value of rap in music.

That is not an educated or reasonable conclusion, and not just because rappers artists use their voice as a (tuned) instrument. There's countless examples of rappers incorporating, collaborating with and evolving every genre. One of my favs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZTYgq4EoRo

I like Kendrick, but the example track you give is exemplary of my first comment: it is not pushing any boundaries musically. It is literally a jazz piece, used as backing for a very lyrical rap. A jazz piece even, that already solidified in the jazz era of the early 20th century. Musically Kendricks track pushes no boundaries and is an easily recognized style that exists for almost a century.

Of course Kendricks work is pushing boundaries. He has an excellent produced voice, the rap a timbre and meter that is fresh. These are musical components of his words, but mere details in all the music in this track. However, the words in his rap are not details.

Personally I have never been into words in music. I barely could hear them growing up listening to metal, and still only register a phrase or two in music today. If you see music and lyrics as different things, I see how you would give rap a bad rap, musically speaking.

My current fav (I can only understand every fifth word obviously): https://soundcloud.com/icespiceee/ice-spice-no-clarity

Re: Jazz Is Freedom

#60
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that's the inherent tension within jazz. It's pure freedom, but it's also inseparable from its history, the people who play it today, and even the audience. Disclosure: I'm a performing jazz bassist. I'm at a level where I can collaborate with bands, but am not good enough to blaze my own path, except to the extent of having a playing style of my own. The canon of tunes, and the "standard arrangement" are both a…

The standard arrangement -- it enables you to put together a group of players who've never worked together to play tunes nobody has even heard before, but then it just sounds like every other jazz band. I'd love to hear your various groups, and am always up for a long bass solo -- I switched from trumpet to bass in college. I don't know if it's possible but it'd be awesome to mix up all of those styles into a single…

Indeed, and just for the non-musicians here, I'll document what the "standard arrangement" is:

    Melody
    Solo 1
    Solo 2
    Bass solo
    Drum solo or "trading fours"
    Melody
    Ending
Moreover, this arrangement lends itself to playing from a "lead sheet" which is just melody plus chord symbols, and players bring "fake books" full of thousands of lead sheets, making it unnecessary for anybody to actually learn tunes.

There are some good things about it, for instance, a beginner can function well enough in a band to play low profile gigs, and gain experience. I certainly owe my present skill level to getting that start, along with playing in the high school jazz band.

Unfortunately, within any given locale, the actual list of tunes that gets played can be quite small, leading to the same tunes getting played over and over again, ad nauseam. It takes some effort, and I think, respect for the audience, to break out of this local minimum, for instance writing more interesting arrangements, rehearsing the band, or just agreeing to explore a wider variety of tunes. Personally, I decided to ditch the fake books, a couple decades ago, and made the effort to either learn the repertoire, or get good at figuring things out by ear.

Unfortunately my various groups are completely un-recorded.

Post reply on HN