Live data from Hacker News

How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

inc.com

51–60 of 62 posts

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#51
post #11
post #6

I find the claim that bezos sees “most of those emails” quite hard to believe. Must be thousands of them

how many people know the address though?

Tons of sellers know it for sure. It was a common tactic to email jeff@ with any seller problems with a hope of getting them addressed quickly.

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#52
post #48
post #43

Allegedly Victor Hugo sent a telegram, which at the time charged by the letter, to his literary agent shortly after the publication of Les Misérables to inquire of its sales: ? The agent responded: !

Supposedly the story goes that in 1843, after annexing the Indian province of Sind, British General Sir Charles Napier sent home a one word telegram, "Peccavi" implying "I have Sind." Although apocryphal, it's still a great story.

Apparently a 16 year old made up the joke and it was published in Punch in 1844.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peccavi

For those who don’t get it, peccavi is Latin for “I have sinned” and it’s a pun as Napier conquered/captured the Indian province Sindh.

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#53
post #6

I find the claim that bezos sees “most of those emails” quite hard to believe. Must be thousands of them

I sent Bezos (@jeff anyway) an email a couple of years ago, about the absurdity of using Alexa.com for the analytics tool, while simultaneously having Alexa the wildly successful voice assistant line. Customers looking for the voice assistant go to Alexa.com, whoops; customers go digging for Alexa on Google and end up at Alexa.com, whoops. A particularly dumb thing for a supposedly smart corporation to do. I went ste…

That’s terrible. Better to go into a black hole than to expose shitty CRM gone wrong.

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#54
post #6

I find the claim that bezos sees “most of those emails” quite hard to believe. Must be thousands of them

I sent Bezos (@jeff anyway) an email a couple of years ago, about the absurdity of using Alexa.com for the analytics tool, while simultaneously having Alexa the wildly successful voice assistant line. Customers looking for the voice assistant go to Alexa.com, whoops; customers go digging for Alexa on Google and end up at Alexa.com, whoops. A particularly dumb thing for a supposedly smart corporation to do. I went ste…

The article also says to do it too: > That email address, by the way, in case you'd like to contact him: jeff@amazon.com I tried it, just for the giggles. I was shocked to get a response only minutes later. > ?

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#55
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't even make sense. The sentence containing the quotation only ends when the quotation itself ends, not before. `print("abc)"`

It’s a tradition from the fixed-width font typewriter era IIRC. Quote mark followed by period looked bad because of all the whitespace.

Is it? I've only ever seen this phenomenon in English text, and it's definitely not a thing in Portuguese.

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#56
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't even make sense. The sentence containing the quotation only ends when the quotation itself ends, not before. `print("abc)"`

It’s a tradition from the fixed-width font typewriter era IIRC. Quote mark followed by period looked bad because of all the whitespace.

In the US (and Canada?).

British English puts commas and periods (full stops) outside the quotation marks unless the quotation is also a complete sentence or the punctuation is part of the quotation.

Source: https://www.unr.edu/writing-speaking-center/student-resource...

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#58
post #13
post #6

I find the claim that bezos sees “most of those emails” quite hard to believe. Must be thousands of them

You've heard of the "royal we"? This is the "executive I". Where the potentate uses the former to lend the weight of the many to their words, the executive uses the latter to take personal credit for the work of many and thereby justify the weightiness of their own salary.

>"executive I".

haha fair enough. Haven't heard that phrasing before

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#59
post #23

Quoted post unavailable.

Corporations have a wonderful and easy way of measuring how much your time is worth. Your salary. If it costs less (salary * time) for you to decipher the cryptic email than it would cost (their salary * their time) for your bosses bosses ... boss to write a non-cryptic email then you deal with it. This isn't kindergarten and it's not about your feelings.

It doesn't actually work though. The very important people who intentionally write cryptic emails invariably end up wasting more of their own time dealing with the resulting misunderstandings compared to just writing out what they're trying to say properly.

Re: How do you respond to a one-character email from your boss's boss's boss? (2018)

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They probably want the money and reputation that Amazon gives them. They have that to lose. What you're saying could be applied to anything people do for their own interest. Taken to the extreme - Afraid of starving? Should have just died instead, then you wouldn't need to depend on food.

That’s a pretty steep slippery-slope there.

Looking at the extreme implications of an argument can help nut out what somebody really thinks or what's really a good idea. Where do you draw the line? If social welfare is available, nobody's job matters?

People often make ridiculous arguments like the GP's without realizing that the same argument also leads to extreme conclusions, so it's probably not really an honest justification for their belief.

Post reply on HN