Earlier quoted context omitted.
"And there aren’t good “data browsers” that have as low a learning curve." If someone is trained to the point of working on genetic data at this level, should they not also have been trained to a reasonable level in domain appropriate software and tools?
I'm continually shocked at how technically incompetent academics can be. Otherwise brilliant people with the most batshit technical workflows I've ever seen.
Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
51–60 of 143 posts
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#52Similarly, if your last name is "Null", sometimes it's just easier to just change your last name.
For reference [0]. It should be tough to have such a name. The most important systems like tax/insurance/airline booking are often the most unkind systems. If you're not familiar with computers, it's almost impossible to imagine the potential cause of problems is your name. [0] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160325-the-names-that-b... > These unlucky people have names that break computers
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#53Something more recent is the introduction into Excel of Power Query, which lets you import a CSV and apply arbitrary transformations (such as applying a type), before it hits the workbook, so if you need to pull in a CSV, you can do so, and it will always be imported the same way.
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#54> Microsoft Excel may be fleeting, but human genes will be around for as long as we are. It’s best to give them names that work. This is the crux of the issue. Yes, Excel could do better with support for CSV. (OpenOffice and LibreOffice habdle this better, for example.) But no, genetics is not some niche use-case for this better support. It's just one example of many. I do analytics of another sort for a bank, and we…
I really wish there was a better interchange format for tabular data. Criteria: - Plain text file - Supports formatting, cell types, etc - Does not support full spreadsheet features like formulas
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please, keep adding to the "tons of other GUI features" list. I'm just started on a Python/Qt/Sqlite project for spreadsheet-like functionality backed by a strongly-typed database. The things that you mention are perfect features. I'd love to know more.
I'm curious, how do you achieve a strongly-typed database with sqlite? sqlite's lack of verifying that your data fits in your defined schema is by far my biggest problem with sqlite.
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The problem is that databases do not include a GUI for data viewing. Let's say that I have PyCharm open right now, I'm importing Qt and Sqlite. How would you like your GUI to function? Seriously, write for me a detailed spec and a detailed workflow, and I'll get to work on it already. My Gmail username is the same as my HN username if you'd prefer to collaborate offline. This invite goes for anybody else who [ab]us…
SQLiteBrowser is written in Qt and is a GUI for SQLite. That's exactly what came in mind when I read parent's post. https://sqlitebrowser.org/
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The real problem is of course using Excel to maintain data. That's not what it's for. That's what databases are for. Excel is for complex calculations over rows and columns. I use MS Excel extensively and create new .xlsx files every week even though I know databases like SQLite, MySQL, and did consulting for Oracle RDBMS. The problem is that databases do not include a GUI for data viewing . And even though I also k…
You are not supposed to have a GUI view when you have 100K+ entries. Excel misguides people to think that database management is easy. The reality is it is not possible to have a GUI view of middle-large databases with millions of entries because it is computationally impossible
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
UTF-8 CSV with a few HTML tags for formatting? You could call it CHU. Now you just need to make Excel accept it.
I'd like it to have support for things like "this is a cell", where format is something like text, numeric, date, currency. I'm not sure how you'd specify that in HTML.
I think it's already defined?
, ,
> currency
You probably need to use the microdata format https://schema.org/Offer
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
There’s not really a better tool that I’ve found. Excel is ubiquitous and pretty easy to use. And there aren’t good “data browsers” that have as low a learning curve. I’ve been especially looking for a JSON browser/editor since excel doesn’t do that well and I’m unsuccessful trying to explain how to use basic text editors to people who can’t do basic functions like open files that aren’t associated with a program.
"And there aren’t good “data browsers” that have as low a learning curve." If someone is trained to the point of working on genetic data at this level, should they not also have been trained to a reasonable level in domain appropriate software and tools?
There’s many times where I don’t want to do anything more than open, sort, filter, and never see the file again. And I’d like something better than Excel, but haven’t found it.
Maybe 70% the time, vi or BBEdit or shell commands work but otherwise excel.
For anything of significance, I use Python notebooks or dedicated data environment.
If there was a better tool, I think people would train. But there’s not, that I’m aware of, so Excel sticks around.
Re: Human genes renamed to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates (2020)
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
"And there aren’t good “data browsers” that have as low a learning curve." If someone is trained to the point of working on genetic data at this level, should they not also have been trained to a reasonable level in domain appropriate software and tools?
I'm continually shocked at how technically incompetent academics can be. Otherwise brilliant people with the most batshit technical workflows I've ever seen.
I’ve done some travel to Africa and am amazed at the ingenuity/batshit workflows that exist to get work done and live life.