Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I have to say that running into a partisan defending the honor of the late Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on the internet is a new experience." Yeh, it's called "propaganda". As you can see, it works. However you have chosen in your oblique reponse to not respond to a simple question: what is your definition of puppet? And how does Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi qualify per that standard? Looking forward to your thoughtful respo…
I imagine being the beneficiary of the 1953 US/UK backed coup would qualify him for puppet status.
Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
51–60 of 60 posts
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
I must object to your "puppet monarch" comment here. By the standards of 'puppetry' that we can discern from historic documents the Shah of Iran was no more of a puppet than a certain "poodle". Do you always prefix "puppet minister" before say mentioning Tony Blair or any of the post Suez UK PMs? People like you who in the tradition of "lingering propaganda" continue to cast calumny on the late Shah of Iran need to l…
From the point of view of the revolutionaries , who objected to "foreign influence". Regardless of how much the Shah was under American influence or Charles I under Papal influence, the perception that they were was used against them by their enemies. (I have to say that running into a partisan defending the honor of the late Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on the internet is a new experience. I was sort of expecting someone t…
That's a really unnecessary quip to make against GP, especially since you failed to address the substance of his argument.
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#53> albeit well over 300 years later, and as further proof that the Irish have perhaps the longest memories in the world. Oh right. At what point do historical figures get a free pass on bringing up their bad doings? And by bad doings, we're talking deaths in the hundreds of thousands, enforced slavery etc.
“Irish slavery” is usually a sign someone is a racist asshole who has no idea what they’re talking about.
So long for the praised HN guidelines.
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#54People tend to remember when you kill a third of their population.
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would love to see Britain become a republic some day for their benefit (up to them of course to vote on that), but agree they need a better hero.
I used to be of that mindset (re: become a republic) but tbh I'm more of the line of thinking, if it ain't broke... With the parliamentary style of government, you need a figurehead. So you'd have to tear up a whole host of UK conventions going back centuries and re-jig everything, just so someone else gets the ceremonial role? Much as some might like a complete re-write, I say expand the unit tests around it if mino…
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#56Cromwell really does have a lingering propaganda support, doesn't he? The UK is one of a very small number of countries to have deliberately restored its monarchy after a revolution and period of parliamentary government, and the reason for that is that Cromwellian government was even worse for a lot of people. A modern analogue might be the Iranian Revolution; congratulations on getting rid of the puppet monarch con…
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#57> albeit well over 300 years later, and as further proof that the Irish have perhaps the longest memories in the world. Oh right. At what point do historical figures get a free pass on bringing up their bad doings? And by bad doings, we're talking deaths in the hundreds of thousands, enforced slavery etc.
Yeah, I am Irish and I think that patriotism is a disease. But even so, historical figures who have reputations for ethnic cleansing and genocide [1] should not be forgotten OR forgiven. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromwellian_conquest_of_Irelan...
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I have to say that running into a partisan defending the honor of the late Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on the internet is a new experience." Yeh, it's called "propaganda". As you can see, it works. However you have chosen in your oblique reponse to not respond to a simple question: what is your definition of puppet? And how does Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi qualify per that standard? Looking forward to your thoughtful respo…
I imagine being the beneficiary of the 1953 US/UK backed coup would qualify him for puppet status.
A sub-set of Iranian society (including military, and clergy) were on the side of the counter-coup that removed Dr. Mossadegh. These Iranians had a shared interest with the US and UK. That is it. And the main military players in the 50s were in fact purged by the 60s, when Shah started his White Revolution after assuming actual power in Iran.
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
I must object to your "puppet monarch" comment here. By the standards of 'puppetry' that we can discern from historic documents the Shah of Iran was no more of a puppet than a certain "poodle". Do you always prefix "puppet minister" before say mentioning Tony Blair or any of the post Suez UK PMs? People like you who in the tradition of "lingering propaganda" continue to cast calumny on the late Shah of Iran need to l…
From the point of view of the revolutionaries , who objected to "foreign influence". Regardless of how much the Shah was under American influence or Charles I under Papal influence, the perception that they were was used against them by their enemies. (I have to say that running into a partisan defending the honor of the late Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on the internet is a new experience. I was sort of expecting someone t…
You should recognize that you denigrate the honor of an entire generation of thoughtful, intelligent, progressive Iranian men and women in industry and academy that very much believed in the Shah's program for Iran.
In fact, what is one saying about a nation when their king is declared a puppet?
Re: Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate
#60Cromwell really does have a lingering propaganda support, doesn't he? The UK is one of a very small number of countries to have deliberately restored its monarchy after a revolution and period of parliamentary government, and the reason for that is that Cromwellian government was even worse for a lot of people. A modern analogue might be the Iranian Revolution; congratulations on getting rid of the puppet monarch con…