Live data from Hacker News

Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows

github.com

51–56 of 56 posts

Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows

#51
post #33

I have seen so many applications like this, and they seem to miss that the backend of windows search is actually pretty amazing, and has providers for a multitude of file types both binary and text, which allows for full content search and not just file name, title, and description. The truth is too its actually really easy to access programmatically. Instead of them rolling their own indexer, they should use somethi…

If the backend of Windows Search is amazing, why is the front-end user experience abysmal? The problems just don't seem like front end problems: the search is occasionally slow, it doesn't even reliably find installed programs by their name, and if the result pops up while your next keystroke is underway it will sometimes lose the result even if that keystroke is correct, and somehow finding the result again will req…

There seems to be more than one index. There is the index of scanned file content, an index for apps, and maybe another one for help. There is also a query timeout. If you start searching after a boot on a slow laptop you get a subset of results dependent on which index is loaded before the query times out. Kill the start menu and try again. And again. And then it works smoothly. It's quite poor.

Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows

#52
post #45
post #12

Just enable the next-gen search bar for Windows 10 - I've used both and the native tool is far better on the latest versions of Windows 10 (at least in my testing). https://www.thurrott.com/cloud/144856/microsoft-testing-new-...

The article you linked is more than two years old. Is this next-gen search bar still not enabled by default?

Still not default as far as I know. I had to enable it on my last install a year ago.

Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not dead, but it's done in my perspective since it does what I wanted it to do when I created it.

Then I suggest updating the readme: > Jarvis is currently under development, and all features are not there yet. Both of those statements are false if what you say is true.

Sure, send a PR.

Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then I suggest updating the readme: > Jarvis is currently under development, and all features are not there yet. Both of those statements are false if what you say is true.

Sure, send a PR.

I don't think that is a PR worthy issue... That's more of a lazy issue.

Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows

#55
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a fork of sorts [1] that is even more active for Wox. [1]: https://github.com/jjw24/Wox

I couldn't see anything about how the features in the fork compare to upstream - do you know what the major differences are?

Mostly bug fixes and more active development so far.
Post reply on HN