I have seen so many applications like this, and they seem to miss that the backend of windows search is actually pretty amazing, and has providers for a multitude of file types both binary and text, which allows for full content search and not just file name, title, and description. The truth is too its actually really easy to access programmatically. Instead of them rolling their own indexer, they should use somethi…
If the backend of Windows Search is amazing, why is the front-end user experience abysmal? The problems just don't seem like front end problems: the search is occasionally slow, it doesn't even reliably find installed programs by their name, and if the result pops up while your next keystroke is underway it will sometimes lose the result even if that keystroke is correct, and somehow finding the result again will req…
Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows
51–56 of 56 posts
Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows
#52Just enable the next-gen search bar for Windows 10 - I've used both and the native tool is far better on the latest versions of Windows 10 (at least in my testing). https://www.thurrott.com/cloud/144856/microsoft-testing-new-...
The article you linked is more than two years old. Is this next-gen search bar still not enabled by default?
Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not dead, but it's done in my perspective since it does what I wanted it to do when I created it.
Then I suggest updating the readme: > Jarvis is currently under development, and all features are not there yet. Both of those statements are false if what you say is true.
Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then I suggest updating the readme: > Jarvis is currently under development, and all features are not there yet. Both of those statements are false if what you say is true.
Sure, send a PR.
Re: Jarvis, an Alfred Alternative for Windows
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a fork of sorts [1] that is even more active for Wox. [1]: https://github.com/jjw24/Wox
I couldn't see anything about how the features in the fork compare to upstream - do you know what the major differences are?