Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume you're looking at overall CO2 emissions rather than per-capita emissions. I’m looking at the page I linked. Per-capita is basically irrelevant, the issue is the total emissions under the control of any one government. Or should China not act until they match the US per-capita but with 3-4x the population? Further the US and European trends are already downwards. China’s is dramatically upwards.
> the issue is the total emissions under the control of any one government Total emissions definitely matter (no need to give speeches in Palau even if per-capita emissions are much greater than in the USA), but considering this number without regard to the population size is completely unrealistic and insensitive. For China's overall emissions to get to the same level as the USA, that means a Chinese citizen would b…
The ecosystem doesn’t actually care whose feelings are hurt, you know. It’s a weird argument to make. China is the single largest emitter of CO2, plastic waste in the oceans, etc etc. Yet we expect them to do nothing about it until 2030 at the earliest, but just stay on their upward trend. Which is about the same time as the ecosystem collapses entirely according to AOC. But we mustn’t be “insensitive” about it!