Live data from Hacker News

The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

nobelprize.org

51–60 of 95 posts

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#51
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume you're looking at overall CO2 emissions rather than per-capita emissions. I’m looking at the page I linked. Per-capita is basically irrelevant, the issue is the total emissions under the control of any one government. Or should China not act until they match the US per-capita but with 3-4x the population? Further the US and European trends are already downwards. China’s is dramatically upwards.

> the issue is the total emissions under the control of any one government Total emissions definitely matter (no need to give speeches in Palau even if per-capita emissions are much greater than in the USA), but considering this number without regard to the population size is completely unrealistic and insensitive. For China's overall emissions to get to the same level as the USA, that means a Chinese citizen would b…

insensitive

The ecosystem doesn’t actually care whose feelings are hurt, you know. It’s a weird argument to make. China is the single largest emitter of CO2, plastic waste in the oceans, etc etc. Yet we expect them to do nothing about it until 2030 at the earliest, but just stay on their upward trend. Which is about the same time as the ecosystem collapses entirely according to AOC. But we mustn’t be “insensitive” about it!

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#52
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the issue is the total emissions under the control of any one government Total emissions definitely matter (no need to give speeches in Palau even if per-capita emissions are much greater than in the USA), but considering this number without regard to the population size is completely unrealistic and insensitive. For China's overall emissions to get to the same level as the USA, that means a Chinese citizen would b…

insensitive The ecosystem doesn’t actually care whose feelings are hurt, you know. It’s a weird argument to make. China is the single largest emitter of CO2, plastic waste in the oceans, etc etc. Yet we expect them to do nothing about it until 2030 at the earliest, but just stay on their upward trend. Which is about the same time as the ecosystem collapses entirely according to AOC. But we mustn’t be “insensitive” ab…

Well I suppose they could split their country, that would lower the emissions of the individual parts and might bring them down to the US level easily.

(Not that they'd be interested in that, but still.)

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#53
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the issue is the total emissions under the control of any one government Total emissions definitely matter (no need to give speeches in Palau even if per-capita emissions are much greater than in the USA), but considering this number without regard to the population size is completely unrealistic and insensitive. For China's overall emissions to get to the same level as the USA, that means a Chinese citizen would b…

insensitive The ecosystem doesn’t actually care whose feelings are hurt, you know. It’s a weird argument to make. China is the single largest emitter of CO2, plastic waste in the oceans, etc etc. Yet we expect them to do nothing about it until 2030 at the earliest, but just stay on their upward trend. Which is about the same time as the ecosystem collapses entirely according to AOC. But we mustn’t be “insensitive” ab…

[deleted]

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#54
post #7

I will see Greta in Denver Friday afternoon at a climate rally. She is young and a voice of her generation. Many future possibilities for her and repairing the climate crisis. I respect the Nobels decision to award the prize to this peace broker. So many global issues that need attention.

[deleted]

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#55
post #48
post #7

I will see Greta in Denver Friday afternoon at a climate rally. She is young and a voice of her generation. Many future possibilities for her and repairing the climate crisis. I respect the Nobels decision to award the prize to this peace broker. So many global issues that need attention.

I am not denouncing her work in ecology activism, but in what way has she contributed to Peace specifically, except for second-order effects?

Global Warming will cause war if not stopped. To fight to stop climate change is to fight for peace.

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#56
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not denouncing her work in ecology activism, but in what way has she contributed to Peace specifically, except for second-order effects?

Global Warming will cause war if not stopped. To fight to stop climate change is to fight for peace.

You have to admit that's very indirect. Most issues can lead to/exacerbate a war. Most technologies, too.

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#57
post #9

Well, this is a much less controversial choice compared to the Nobel Prize in Literature 2019.

From a global perspective, awarding two European writers yet again is just a failure. From a purely literary perspective, Handke is a great and influential writer, who was a hot candidate for a long time. For his work, I think the award is justified. On a personal level, his ex-wife accused him of physical abuse, he held a eulogy for a war criminal, was known for cursing and berating his audience, ... If he still sho…

> Handke is a great and influential writer

I have couple of free weekends coming up. which book should read ?

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#58
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Global Warming will cause war if not stopped. To fight to stop climate change is to fight for peace.

You have to admit that's very indirect. Most issues can lead to/exacerbate a war. Most technologies, too.

I don't think it's indirect at all.

Climate change will very nearly directly cause war. It will and already is causing food shortages, flooding, drought, etc. This will cause mass migration and conflict for resources. It's about as close to directly causing war as a thing can be.

Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2019

#60

[flagged]

Considering Trump made the decision not to attack Iran and start WWIII after Iran downed a US drone (despite immense pressure from neocons like Bolton), Trump actually deserves a little credit for being a relatively peaceful president.

He hasn't started any new conflicts and just recently started pulling US troops out of Syria. Can't say that for his predicessors. I understand that people don't like Trump due to his pompous and abrasive personality, but his foreign policy has been suprisingly sane (ignoring all his other policy).

Post reply on HN