Assuming GitHub was actually losing money and couldn't fix that problem quickly enough it's fair to assume they had to sell, and it's reasonable to believe there aren't that many companies who could have bought them if you think an understanding of the domain is important, then you're really limited to Facebook (user surveillance, adverts), Apple (bad at software, not developer friendly), Google (user surveillance, a…
What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
51–60 of 228 posts
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#52Assuming GitHub was actually losing money and couldn't fix that problem quickly enough it's fair to assume they had to sell, and it's reasonable to believe there aren't that many companies who could have bought them if you think an understanding of the domain is important, then you're really limited to Facebook (user surveillance, adverts), Apple (bad at software, not developer friendly), Google (user surveillance, a…
I don't really see how anything other than being perfect stewards of Github works out in their favour.
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#53I moved all my workflow to Linux back-in-the-day (actually just over 2 years ago, but hey) and never looked back. I'll be damned if I let Microsoft in by this particular backdoor.
Like the author, I'm deleting my account as well.
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#54Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are, just not to the FOSS crowd that tries to use macOS as if it was GNU/Linux with a pretty face.
Well, you pretty much describe my use case for Apple laptops. I resisted for a long time and used Linux desktop for dev work, but when I bought the first MacBook I never looked back. I would describe macOS as Linux desktop that works.
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#56Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#57Microsoft used to be bad (M$) but if you haven't noticed you can now run Linux on Windows and sql server runs on Linux. We're in the twilight zone bro; all bets are off.
Sure, I don't need it and could care less.. just saying.
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#58Some of the shenanigans I've seen recently from MS employees in the .NET Core and JS space doesn't inspire me with confidence... For all of Nadella's "turning over a new leaf", it will still take a generation to change the culture of 120 000 employees
> the shenanigans I've seen recently from MS employees in the .NET Core and JS space Do you have links? I Havent heard MS doing anything malicious recently in these spaces.
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
XCode is a clunky horrible mess of an IDE, iTunes Connect is worse, and they charge $100/year for a developer account. Also, they try to lock you in to buying Apple hardware to develop for Apple devices (though you can get around that using, among others, Microsoft's Visual Studio App Center).
You can use AppCode. XCode being a mess is not making Apple developer unfriendly, it just means that they don`t know how to make a good IDE. I don`t mind 100$ per year if it means better support then nonexistant Google support. Also if I am making money off the platform I don`t mind paying. And it also stops random people submitting crap apps to the store.
It clearly doesn't work.
Re: What is wrong with Microsoft buying GitHub
#60The biggest surprise to me was that Github was running at a loss for a considerable amount of time. Given their roots as a bootstrapped company, I would've assumed that they would be more disciplined in their spending. I'm disappointed that they've decided to sell rather than go public, I would've happily been a shareholder of Github if given the choice.