Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 1981 I'm not sure that it was so obvious that computers would take over the world, definitely not to the general public. For context, I was 10 years old at the time, and was the only kid in my school that owned a computer, a TI-99 that used a cassette drive as storage. It was so left-of-field to own a computer, that I remember not even really talking about it to my friends in school, because they had no context fo…
You're approximately 2 years older than me. Fast forward to the Commodore Christmas of 1985. Pretty much everyone I knew got a C_64 that year.Things changed quickly.
Nightline Interview with Steve Jobs (1981) [video]
51–52 of 52 posts
Re: Nightline Interview with Steve Jobs (1981) [video]
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK that's a fair point. But suppose instead I said, "the percentage of the population living on less than $50k per year in real terms has dropped by about a quarter since 1971". Does the graph support that statement?
If you do use the graph as reference, it is actually more like the percentage dropped by ~ 11.5% (this is by counting out the cumulative percentage represented by each bar)- which is not at all what you would eyeball it at. Like I said, really bad graph to showcase anything.
I don't understand this point.
Here is the same graph with 3 areas shaded: http://imgur.com/a/xco37
It looks to me like Area A is about a quarter of area B and about an eighth of Area C. Isn't that about what most people would eyeball it at?