Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But, someone buying stuff made by their employer is not what harms them. It is exactly what harms them. With that logic one can defend keeping children in tantalum mines in the supply chain of an iPhone. That's not an acceptable status quo... Removing the market for immoral exploitation of beings and the environment is a necessary step. The size of the market for things made fairly needs to grow.
There are kids in Congo that are claiming to be older than they are so they can get work in mines to feed themselves and their families. If they don’t work they and their families starve, but if they do work they are encouraging immoral child labor. I don’t understand why many people think the answer is easy and straightforward in that case, this sounds like the trolley problem to me.
As a consumer one of the few immediate means of action we have is to at least refuse these products when we can... Then yeah, vote, donate, get involved for these kids to live decently.