Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are common definitions of what words mean. If the meaning of words become arbitrary then we lose the ability to communicate effectively. An action was taken, e.g. picking up a quarter off the side walk. There is no need to put another label on it randomly, just call it what it is, picking up a quarter. By using a word that already has a commonly accepted meaning, and a negative one at that, and associate it wit…
>There are common definitions of what words mean. What are they? People assume their definition is common, but everything is much less clear than that. This causes frequent disagreements, and it's best to get more information. >There is no need to put another label on it randomly, just call it what it is, picking up a quarter. There is no need for me to label the action at all unless I'm in a position to explain what…
That's what I mean with the rapist example too. If you have sex with someone, do I have the right to call you a rapist first and withhold judgement until I have more information? If for me a rapist isn't necessarily a bad act.