Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly and that's not mentioning the benifit of being able to easily recover a failed prototype or even just analysis of a failed prototype. Imagine trying to diagnose a problem that comes up 10 months into the program after the probe is no longer in a direct visual path or while communications via microwaves start taking 10-20 seconds from point to point. There are too many questions to be answered before we can ju…
I don't understand why the human cost of space travel is always weighted so heavily. All exploration costs lives. How many died conquering America? Exploring the poles? The Everest? To this day people die in the Everest. It's their choice to risk their lives in such a way. Yet I don't hear people saying "don't go there". Space is riskier, but also has more rewards.
SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
491–500 of 513 posts
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#492Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have a source stating that the people crewing the Dragon would need to do anything at all? Won't it just be on autopilot, what duties is the crew of the capsule expected to perform?
If something bad happens, you don't want to say "oh well, guess I should have sent an expert with them after all."
Where would one find an expert in lunar circumnavigation?
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#493Earlier quoted context omitted.
An elected government, at least i theory, is tasked with doing good by its people. That isnt always true, but at least there are elections. An individual person suffers no such limitation. That can act purely in thier own interest without even a tueoretical check. If they want to ride a rocket to the moon, while children on earth starve, there is absoluely nothing we poor can do about it.
There is the possibility that the wealth of an individual was acquired through voluntary trade. In that case, the person has already done so much good for other people that asking them for philanthropy instead of self-indulgence is renegotiating a deal that has already closed. In contrast, most governments have acquired massive wealth through taxation of their subjects. Those subjects are less likely to tolerate the…
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#494Earlier quoted context omitted.
Musk sends partially re-usable rockets into space for a few years now. A decade ago, all he had were some fancy powerpoint slides. We sure have different definitions of "delivering".
We're still not 100% that they're reusable in a meaningful way that actually reduces costs. The landings are awesome but if it costs too much to reuse them it's more a stunt than anything because as good as it is to not just chunk that hunk of metal in the ocean every launch if it's cheaper that's how it'll be done.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#495Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being the first to land on the moon was never intended to be cheap. So many things had to be invented simply to get there. Just imagine how economical space flight would be if all of that 1960s technology had been incrementally improved on for efficiency, manufacturing ease, and scale instead of a lot of it being almost literallly mothballed.
There was never any reason to spend that kind of money. It was worth going to the moon once to see what was there, but I have yet to see anybody articulate a reason to go back that doesn't rely on soaring rhetoric and implausible money-making schemes.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#496Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rockets (or any research) > bombs any day of the week. Yes, my tax dollars going towards research (even indirectly) is better than the way most of my money is spent
The military is something like 20% of the budget. That's not where most of your money is going.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#497Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't Earth closer to Mars half a (lunar) month ?
No. The Moon is in orbit around the Earth and both the Earth and Mars are in orbit around the sun. The Moon varies between 360,000 and 400,000 km away and the closest Mars gets to us is 54,600,000 kilometers. Those numbers are a bit of an exaggeration because how much fuel you need is just as important as absolute distance/time to travel and for that you need 4 km/s of delta-v to get from Earth orbit to Moon orbit an…
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#498Earlier quoted context omitted.
Musk sends partially re-usable rockets into space for a few years now. A decade ago, all he had were some fancy powerpoint slides. We sure have different definitions of "delivering".
We're still not 100% that they're reusable in a meaningful way that actually reduces costs. The landings are awesome but if it costs too much to reuse them it's more a stunt than anything because as good as it is to not just chunk that hunk of metal in the ocean every launch if it's cheaper that's how it'll be done.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#499Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't know about ullage motors, thanks for the link. The link also says that only very tiny accelerations are needed - so this shouldn't be a big problem for a tanker. Like I hypothesized, the problem has been solved.
Bearing in mind that the ullage motors need to be of a type that won't suffer from ullage problems. That implies they cant use the main motor fuel. The saturn 5 used small solid rockets as ullage motors. Alternatively you could use externally pressurised bladder tanks for a range of non-cryogenic fuels. Cold gas or possibly h2o2 as a monopropellant come to mind. Either option has a comparatively low specific impulse,…
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#500Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Can't wait to hear who booked this trip! Definitely one of the coolest ways to spend a lot of superfluous money :) Imagine it ends up being some celebrity, like Leonardo di Caprio (who has shown interest in space IIRC) or Lady Gaga. Don't you think it would somehow tarnish the whole thing?
Not Leonardo di Caprio, he will stay behind even though there is enough room for two people on that return vehicle. Also, hopefully not Matt Damon.