Classic EU move, the last-minute 1000-cycle exemption undercuts the entire regulation.
Looks like saner minds prevailed. Almost nobody needs or wants that. Having to pay a street corner repair shop to replace a battery only after 3 or 4 years of usage is completely worth a price to pay for having thinner batteries.
Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
461–470 of 560 posts
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#462Earlier quoted context omitted.
An operating system is only part of the software you might need to update or secure on a phone (as is the case with many other devices).
Indeed! The law needs to include firmware in some way. I'm not smart enough to come up with how exactly it should be dealt with, but it does need to be dealt with. Currently Qualcomm decides when your phone stops getting updates, pretty much regardless to who actually made your phone. Shoutout to fairphone who actually updated the firmware themselves, surely a loss leading project, but a very respectable dedication t…
I am not sure how much of a shout-out they deserve. For example, Fairphone 4 is still supported until this year. They ship with firmware from 2023 and with a kernel patch release from 2024. Every one of their phones is full of holes because their software lags so much.
Even on their most recent model, they are frequently more than a half year behind firmware updates, ship 1-2 year old kernels, and are late with major Android releases (meaning you miss out on security patches not classified high/critical).
Good examples of software longevity are iPhone, Google Pixel, GrapheneOS, and to a lesser extend Samsung flagships.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#463Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worse than I thought: https://support.casio.com/en/support/answer.php?cid=00900101... "• To maintain water resistance, have the gaskets of your watch replaced periodically (about once every two or three years)."
It seems like the same can be true for the glue used on the iPhone. > Splash, water, and dust resistance are not permanent conditions and resistance might decrease as a result of normal wear. Liquid damage is not covered under warranty, but you might have rights under consumer law.[0] If a gasket has a predictable life, there could be a warning after that period that the water resistance may be compromised and to rep…
These things _do_not_break_. Once I rashly dropped mine on a concrete floor to show off to a friend. I regretted it immediately, thinking oh no, I didn't have to take it that far... it turned out it was completely fine. I washed it with soap when I got mud over it. It also weighed a ton in my pocket.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#464Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you sure the loophole exists? AFAIK, this is the regulation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj/eng I don't see that exemption listed. The other ones are, but not that one.
Take this with a mountain of salt since I've not at all an expert, but with a little help from AI, it seems like the exemption lives in 2023/1670 [0]. The LLM claims that this and the regulation you link are interconnected, with the recital of 2023/1542 explicitly linking them. 0: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A...
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#465Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is also a rugged phone. So if you want to make a fair comparison with an iPhone, you have to put the iPhone in a case, resulting in a similar weight and thickness.
The distinction, though, is that you get to make that choice as the consumer. You can carry the phone with no case, or you can put a very rugged case on it, or something in between.
From the narrow point of view of "this option or nothing", yes.
For the more general purpose view of "imagine a non-rugged version", such a phone would have a lot less of a size/weight penalty.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#466Can I play devil's advocate for a moment? Imagine that Apple decides to protest this new rule. They say: We will stop stelling iPhones in the EU. However, you can buy from non-EU countries (US, Canada, AUS/NZ, UK, etc.), and we will ship to you, or you can use a third party shipper. I know, I know, HN crowd loves to play legal games like this ("this one weird trick...") -- they rarely work in the Real World. Real leg…
If Apple wants to keep any of their other services and products, they will also be subject to consumer protection regulation meaning they can’t geoblock consumers and they have to ensure their unsafe products don’t end up with EU citizens.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#467Earlier quoted context omitted.
But what exactly is a charge cycle? I mean, the effect on a battery being loaded from 0% to 100% and drained to 0% again is vastly different from a battery being charged from 40% to 50% and being used until 40% ten times in a row.
And how many people have the free mental space to manage the charge capacity of their phone? I plug mine into the charger when I go to bed, and unplug it in the morning when I start my day. I don't have time to think about phone charge levels much beyond that.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#468Earlier quoted context omitted.
False dichotomy. The question isn't whether you can make money with a replaceable battery, but whether you can make more money by selling specialized service (or an entirely new phone) than a battery. What else are people going to do, not buy a phone? Switch operating systems entirely? This whole thing becomes more obvious in the Android world, where models with various features do exist, but only in certain markets…
People can, and do, switch OSes. Or use a flip phone.
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#469Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately it is from 2022, meaning no OS upgrades. I think the next mandatory laws EU should pass is that manufacturers should either allow people to upgrade/replace the OS by themselves or provide mandatory upgrades for the next decade (i don't care how the manufacturers handle it, that's up to them, but the easiest way out of such a law is to allow people upgrade/replace the OS by themselves).
The regulation already mandates an OS upgrade period, but the period depends on how long the manufacturer keeps selling the model: software updates must be provided for five years from the day when the manufacturer stops selling the product. From Annex II B, section 1.2: > (6) Operating system updates: > (a) from the date of end of placement on the market to at least 5 years after that date, manufacturers, importers…
Motorola already seems to be testing this interpretation of the law.
https://www.androidauthority.com/motorola-eu-software-update...
Re: Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027
#470I wish the EU would tackle standardization of tool batteries. It's so stupid that every brand has their own battery system.
I wish they would stop trying to over regulate everything. If you want to use your tool battery in another brand just get an adapter.