Live data from Hacker News

The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

twitter.com

451–460 of 505 posts

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#451

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Slurs are made by context, tone, and perception by the target. I have never been called "cis" except by people with antagonistic tones trying to get a rise out of me. Furthermore the overwhelming majority of the roughly two billion English speakers around the world who aren't trans do not self-describe as "cis". It's a slur.

> I have never been called "cis" except by people with antagonistic tones trying to get a rise out of me. I can tell you from personal experience that this says more about you than the word. The majority of people in my circle would self describe as cis, and most people I interact with would self identify as cis if the meaning was explained to them.

I've only heard it been used as an insult.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of these authoritarian excuses matter. They can say what they want about who they want now.

Moderation is not authoritarianism.

If you use moderation as a tool to push your ideology, sure it is.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#453

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could make that argument about any group that has a large amount of critics. Congress, for example, has an approval rating under that of trans people. I propose Twitter bans anybody who "berates" a politician. If we don't do that then Twitter is allowing the environment to be too unpleasant for one the most marginalized groups out there. Why would my plan be bad, but yours good? Just because there is an environme…

Partly due to power imbalance. Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople. They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them. They don't have high levels of homelessness, abuse, and suicide. Additionally, congresspeople are public figures - being satirized is part of the social contract when you become a public figure. And co…

> Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople.

…why do you think politicians have bodyguards?

> They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them.

Not doing unnecessary cosmetic surgery is not “actively hostile”.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#454

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

It is transphobic when you deliberately say the wrong thing (especially with an intent to harm or be inflammatory). A trans woman is a woman.

No post body was provided.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#455

Great, they should have never been banned to begin with.

The right of free speech doesn't apply to a private company. A company has every right to dictate what services it will provide and the conditions for using those services. It is not a public communications carrier.

And for the same reason Musk has a right to unban them, so what are you complaining about?

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#456

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope. You can be a man or a woman. Or you, in a very minority case, might be trans. The point is that there is absolutely no need for the "cis" identifier.

Quoted post unavailable.

No post body was provided.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#457

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think, but I do not have the data, that there is plenty of left speech that is banned on Twitter. I mean left as in, not Democrat (which Americans seem to think is a lefty party), but actual leftists discussing socialism and anarchism theory. And not even the autocratic leftist stuff (which sucks. Leftist dictators suck), just like every day "we should tax more and build social housing and stop evictions" leftists.

I'm a member of NAFO. I've spent a lot of time on Twitter the last 8 months. I've not seen signs of this: on the contrary we have had to work hard to get Twitter to ban the worst of the worst (e.g. socialist accounts who argue openly for military attacks on Ukrainian civilians far from the front lines - or even worse). It would be great if the same Twitter that finds it OK to throw out Babylon Bee for having fun with…

Yeah, fuck tankies. Fuck antisemitism. What you describe should be banned as well.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#458
post #453

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Partly due to power imbalance. Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople. They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them. They don't have high levels of homelessness, abuse, and suicide. Additionally, congresspeople are public figures - being satirized is part of the social contract when you become a public figure. And co…

> Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople. …why do you think politicians have bodyguards? > They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them. Not doing unnecessary cosmetic surgery is not “actively hostile”.

A) It's not just surgery, there's the difficulty in getting HRT.

B) For some trans people, the surgery is necessary from a quality of life perspective and a reduction of dysphoria.

C) It varies by country. In the US, the medical system is actively hostile to everyone (but especially trans people). In the UK, the requirements to just get HRT as a legal adult are insane.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#459
post #449

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For sure. I've had this discussion many times with many people. I'd argue that most women, in fact probably 99% or more, fall into a fairly straightforward definition - two X chromosomes, raised to behave like whatever their society expects from women. (I think we can agree that "woman" might have different cultural/social expectations depending on where they were raised? E.g. in some parts of the world a niqab or ha…

You're using intersex ppl and the very real issues they have faced to then push gender ideology (your transition at the end to "A group whose bodies are functionally male but who feel a deep revulsion at being a man"). That's exploitative of intersex people but is sadly consistent with gender ideologues always trying to piggyback on other group's issues (e.g. the attempt to piggbyback on the struggles that same sex a…

I'm starting a discussion about the definition of women and men, first by discussing cis people, then introducing the idea that the simple label doesn't always apply, and if there is agreement, I planned to discuss trans and non binary identities.

The goal is to explain that it is not as simple as XX or XY, not to say trans and intersex people face the same challenges.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#460
post #449

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For sure. I've had this discussion many times with many people. I'd argue that most women, in fact probably 99% or more, fall into a fairly straightforward definition - two X chromosomes, raised to behave like whatever their society expects from women. (I think we can agree that "woman" might have different cultural/social expectations depending on where they were raised? E.g. in some parts of the world a niqab or ha…

You're using intersex ppl and the very real issues they have faced to then push gender ideology (your transition at the end to "A group whose bodies are functionally male but who feel a deep revulsion at being a man"). That's exploitative of intersex people but is sadly consistent with gender ideologues always trying to piggyback on other group's issues (e.g. the attempt to piggbyback on the struggles that same sex a…

You are aware that trans individuals have been part of the LGBT movement feom the beginning, even back before AIDS when it was the GLBT movement, right?
Post reply on HN