Earlier quoted context omitted.
Slurs are made by context, tone, and perception by the target. I have never been called "cis" except by people with antagonistic tones trying to get a rise out of me. Furthermore the overwhelming majority of the roughly two billion English speakers around the world who aren't trans do not self-describe as "cis". It's a slur.
> I have never been called "cis" except by people with antagonistic tones trying to get a rise out of me. I can tell you from personal experience that this says more about you than the word. The majority of people in my circle would self describe as cis, and most people I interact with would self identify as cis if the meaning was explained to them.
The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
451–460 of 505 posts
Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#452Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#453Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could make that argument about any group that has a large amount of critics. Congress, for example, has an approval rating under that of trans people. I propose Twitter bans anybody who "berates" a politician. If we don't do that then Twitter is allowing the environment to be too unpleasant for one the most marginalized groups out there. Why would my plan be bad, but yours good? Just because there is an environme…
Partly due to power imbalance. Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople. They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them. They don't have high levels of homelessness, abuse, and suicide. Additionally, congresspeople are public figures - being satirized is part of the social contract when you become a public figure. And co…
…why do you think politicians have bodyguards?
> They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them.
Not doing unnecessary cosmetic surgery is not “actively hostile”.
Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#454Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#455Great, they should have never been banned to begin with.
The right of free speech doesn't apply to a private company. A company has every right to dictate what services it will provide and the conditions for using those services. It is not a public communications carrier.
Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#456Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#457Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think, but I do not have the data, that there is plenty of left speech that is banned on Twitter. I mean left as in, not Democrat (which Americans seem to think is a lefty party), but actual leftists discussing socialism and anarchism theory. And not even the autocratic leftist stuff (which sucks. Leftist dictators suck), just like every day "we should tax more and build social housing and stop evictions" leftists.
I'm a member of NAFO. I've spent a lot of time on Twitter the last 8 months. I've not seen signs of this: on the contrary we have had to work hard to get Twitter to ban the worst of the worst (e.g. socialist accounts who argue openly for military attacks on Ukrainian civilians far from the front lines - or even worse). It would be great if the same Twitter that finds it OK to throw out Babylon Bee for having fun with…
Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#458Earlier quoted context omitted.
Partly due to power imbalance. Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople. They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them. They don't have high levels of homelessness, abuse, and suicide. Additionally, congresspeople are public figures - being satirized is part of the social contract when you become a public figure. And co…
> Congresspeople are not typically subject to routine violence just because they are congresspeople. …why do you think politicians have bodyguards? > They aren't typically dealing with a healthcare system that is actively hostile to them. Not doing unnecessary cosmetic surgery is not “actively hostile”.
B) For some trans people, the surgery is necessary from a quality of life perspective and a reduction of dysphoria.
C) It varies by country. In the US, the medical system is actively hostile to everyone (but especially trans people). In the UK, the requirements to just get HRT as a legal adult are insane.
Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#459Earlier quoted context omitted.
For sure. I've had this discussion many times with many people. I'd argue that most women, in fact probably 99% or more, fall into a fairly straightforward definition - two X chromosomes, raised to behave like whatever their society expects from women. (I think we can agree that "woman" might have different cultural/social expectations depending on where they were raised? E.g. in some parts of the world a niqab or ha…
You're using intersex ppl and the very real issues they have faced to then push gender ideology (your transition at the end to "A group whose bodies are functionally male but who feel a deep revulsion at being a man"). That's exploitative of intersex people but is sadly consistent with gender ideologues always trying to piggyback on other group's issues (e.g. the attempt to piggbyback on the struggles that same sex a…
The goal is to explain that it is not as simple as XX or XY, not to say trans and intersex people face the same challenges.
Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended
#460Earlier quoted context omitted.
For sure. I've had this discussion many times with many people. I'd argue that most women, in fact probably 99% or more, fall into a fairly straightforward definition - two X chromosomes, raised to behave like whatever their society expects from women. (I think we can agree that "woman" might have different cultural/social expectations depending on where they were raised? E.g. in some parts of the world a niqab or ha…
You're using intersex ppl and the very real issues they have faced to then push gender ideology (your transition at the end to "A group whose bodies are functionally male but who feel a deep revulsion at being a man"). That's exploitative of intersex people but is sadly consistent with gender ideologues always trying to piggyback on other group's issues (e.g. the attempt to piggbyback on the struggles that same sex a…