Earlier quoted context omitted.
Notice that the presentation is from 2008 - a lot changes in five years.
One such change is coming/has come online in Utah.
XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
441–450 of 641 posts
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#442>How do I find a strong-selector for a known target? >How do I find a cell of terrorists that has no known connection to strong-selectors? >Answer: Look for anomalous events >E.g. Someone whose language is out of place for the region they are in >Someone who is using encryption >Someone searching the web for suspicious stuff Lovely. Suspicious stuff and encryption. But wait! There's more! >Show me all the VPN startup…
I'd like to know where they are keeping these "over 300 terrorists" that have been captured due to this program. How is one labeled a terrorist by this program I wonder?
Pretty fucking scary if you ask me.
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#443It seems like everyone's been attacking the wrong folks. From this article it appears that bulk of the data is being tapped at the data center level and then parsed. This begs the question how it would be able to make sense of https traffic.
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd like to know where they are keeping these "over 300 terrorists" that have been captured due to this program. How is one labeled a terrorist by this program I wonder?
This. This is what worries me more than anything. Where have these 300 people gone? There should be records, trials, something. 300 suspected terrorists going on trial over a period of 5 years should have resulted in huge wave of almost 24/7 publicity. That the NSA is in the business of total surveillance is bad enough. But there is the faint hint that the NSA is in the business of making people disappear.
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#445Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#446Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would we assume that TLS is safe? The NSA could just as easily compromise the CAs and get all the certificates they need.
Not exactly. Compromising a CA would let them fool a browser into thinking that a fake Google certificate is a real one. However, if Google were diligent, they could publish their valid cert signatures anywhere they like, and users could check the signatures of the certs that are presented as genuine. The TSA can't crack or impersonate a cert at will; they can only 1) try to trick you into accepting a phony one or 2)…
They're taking it a step further and using certificate pinning in Chrome to catch MITM attacks in real time across a large portion of the internet. http://blog.chromium.org/2011/06/new-chromium-security-featu...
It's not scalable at all, but cuts out a large attack vector for a lot of communications. It wouldn't take a ton of pinned certificates to make a big dent in these NSA programs--really just look at the logos and make sure that each has their certificates pinned.
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stallman's stance is against all cell phones, not just smartphones. And I'd argue that in 2013, to the point where we're issuing basic phones to welfare recipients for the purpose of job searching, that this is an invalid conclusion. As is only using the FSF's definition of free software (where it matters less that the software itself is free, but that the software doesn't point out to you any nonfree addons. Fedora…
I fail to see how not owning a cellphone, only using free software and suitable hardware puts me at a greater inconvenience than, say, having all my life (movements, communication, interests) digitally recorded and made available for later arbitrary use (by any type of government we might have ...). I honestly wish I had the willpower and independence to pull it off. On the other hand, I totally understand the people…
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#448Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just want to clarify something: > I can see how they get HTTP information, since they would intercept at transit hubs - but how are they getting all Facebook private messages and Gmail? I don't know how they're getting GMail(and this is probably a slide from when GMail was accessible via HTTP and not HTTPS), but Facebook chat specifically is done over a non-secure XMPP server. The only 'secure' part of that transacti…
With Gmail, all it takes is one request to almost any Google service to leak through a non http connection and they have your Auth cookie. Once they have that, they are you. And yes it is that easy, anyone can pull it off at Starbucks, hotels, even some ISPs.
Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#449Re: XKeyscore: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
The technical possibility isn't the new and staggering part, it's the profound lack of morality, respect for any ideal whatsoever, and compete apathy towards the oaths these people took to serve us . They have compeley misused the power we granted them in sacred trust. We should remove it from them at once. If this has become impossible, we need to know that as soon as we can.
> The technical possibility isn't the new and staggering part, it's the profound lack of morality, respect for any ideal whatsoever, and compete apathy towards the oaths these people took to serve us. Again, I'll chime in as the resident apologist. The people working at Fort Meade are not evil. They truly believe they're doing a great service to the nation. They may be wrong, and they've certainly thrown privacy out…
Same with the politicians; were they really for it, or simply incredibly afraid of the political suicide that would be the results of standing up against it? Because this was a time when people did not question Bush. From today's perspective on his administration's actions, that seems odd, but it was the reality at the time.