Live data from Hacker News

Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

reuters.com

441–450 of 623 posts

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#441
post #351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm pretty sure Amazon and Tesla pay great relative to their space. > I'm sure most Amazon warehouse jobs start in the $15-20/hr range. How much better can you really get for what is essentially reading a screen, grabbing something off of a shelf, and putting it in a box? Amazon is also one of the richest companies in the world, largely dependant on the work of each and every one of those warehouse workers. Why is…

> If that's unrealistic, still: Amazon's profit went up by 84% in 2020. Why shouldn't workers seek for their wages to go up 84% instead? So, say Amazon's net income in 2019 was $11.5B, and that they paid employees about $25B. Even if Amazon's scale in 2020 required no additional workers, increasing wages for those existing workers by 84% would have wiped out Amazon's entire profit and more despite a banner year.

You're right, I made a classic mistake in comparing percentages...

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm pretty sure Amazon and Tesla pay great relative to their space. > I'm sure most Amazon warehouse jobs start in the $15-20/hr range. How much better can you really get for what is essentially reading a screen, grabbing something off of a shelf, and putting it in a box? Amazon is also one of the richest companies in the world, largely dependant on the work of each and every one of those warehouse workers. Why is…

> Amazon's profit went up by 84% in 2020. Why shouldn't workers seek for their wages to go up 84% instead? Amazon’s moneymaker is AWS, not the warehouse. At least in my city, AWS salaries have went up a fair amount in the last year or two, which makes sense given that AWS generates lots of profit. The warehouse on the other hand has much thinner margins and if they largely increased warehouse worker salaries they mig…

I doubt warehouse salaries are a significant percentage of costs for Amazon outside AWS. And the non-AWS part of Amazon is still significantly larger than AWS (revenue ~346 billion dollars vs ~40 billion for AWS) even if it is indeed less profitable. Warehousing is of course not that profitable, but it is a significant enabler for the sales of the rest of the business (perhaps even for AWS infrastructure).

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#443
post #134

Working in France completely changed my view of unions. I sure hope the horrors I saw won’t happen to Tesla.

And yet, the level of inequity in france is nowhere near as much as USA. Sure there arn't as many mega rich, but then there arn't people hundreds of thousands of people being bankrupted by medical bills either.

How is being bankrupted by medical bills relevant to unions?

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet, the level of inequity in france is nowhere near as much as USA. Sure there arn't as many mega rich, but then there arn't people hundreds of thousands of people being bankrupted by medical bills either.

How is being bankrupted by medical bills relevant to unions?

The weakness of the latter directly contributes to the former.

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Senators don't bring antitrust suits against anyone, as far as I know. That would be a separate branch of government.

Senators can pass laws increasing the grounds for antitrust actions.

But the things they say about the laws aren’t very useful if you’re suing to get the law overturned. (Related, you can’t use defenses like attorney-client privilege if Congress asks you to submit documents, you just do it.)

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The horrors of... a 35 hour workweek, 5 weeks paid vacation, 16 weeks paid maternity leave, universal healthcare, and no at-will employment?

Ah, classic selection bias blinders on. Sure, great benefits for those who have jobs. What about for the people who can't get employed due to the conditions on labor? The young, poor, already jobless? Not so much concern for them, you got yours.

I'm not sure how COVID has effected it, but for the past years France has had a higher prime age labor force participation rate then the US, so it doesn't seem to be causing that issue.

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The biggest confusion I have is everybody seems to approach Amazon and Tesla unionization as "hopefully it happens so workers will get better wages!" I could be wrong but... I'm pretty sure Amazon and Tesla pay great relative to their space. Relatively demanding, sure. I get it. We've all seen the article where some Amazon worker urinated in a bottle because "the job is just so ruthless!". They employ hundreds of tho…

> I'm pretty sure Amazon and Tesla pay great relative to their space. > I'm sure most Amazon warehouse jobs start in the $15-20/hr range. How much better can you really get for what is essentially reading a screen, grabbing something off of a shelf, and putting it in a box? Amazon is also one of the richest companies in the world, largely dependant on the work of each and every one of those warehouse workers. Why is…

"Not saying that they should, but there is a strange double standard in these sorts of discussions, where it is taken for granted that the company should seek to extract the maximum amount of profit from its workers, but the other way around is seen as abnormal. "

Your claim is fallacious because unions are 3rd parties. Nobody has anything against the 2 parties (employee and employer) trying to legally extract as much out of each other as possible.

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#449

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The biggest confusion I have is everybody seems to approach Amazon and Tesla unionization as "hopefully it happens so workers will get better wages!" I could be wrong but... I'm pretty sure Amazon and Tesla pay great relative to their space. Relatively demanding, sure. I get it. We've all seen the article where some Amazon worker urinated in a bottle because "the job is just so ruthless!". They employ hundreds of tho…

> If it was that bad, I think they'd have a harder time hiring. You're severely underestimating the punishing conditions of an Amazon warehouse job. A picker has a tablet that alerts them of an item to get. A clock starts counting down on the time you have to get to the right bin, find the item, and scan it. The warehouse sorting algorithms created by Amazon engineers optimize for retrieval time - but the warehouses…

Please call me back when you can prove those Amazon employees signed their work contracts with a gun to their temples.

Re: Elon Musk’s anti-union tweet from 2018 must be deleted: U.S. labor board

#450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sadly for the argument, this decrease in poverty only happened as a result of China - if you remove China there basically is no difference anymore. If you adjust your definition of poverty to local inflation, you also barely see any difference anymore.

But... Chinese people are still people? Who deserve to not live in poverty. I don’t understand your point. I have also heard some compelling arguments that a similar transformation is likely on the way in sub-Saharan African over the next few decades. Also these are real dollars, they are adjusted for inflation.

Inflation in different countries goes at different rates. You can't use dollar inflation for these conditions, as prices rise much faster in those countries.

As for Chinese people, it is amazing that they came out of poverty. But clearly it's not thanks to free market capitalism.

Post reply on HN