Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

opusfived.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

431–439 of 439 posts

Re: Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

#431

Post by dpark »

rnjesus wrote: post #382
dpark wrote: post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the relief of finally remembering the name felt like, well, hitting a jackpot I understand the joy of success but I fail to see how this is gambling. I could have an equivalent conversation with a friend (more likely about a movie in trying to remember than a painting, but still) and get the exact same type of iterative “no, not that one, it was more like X” and feel elated when my friend finally realizes I’m takin…

sorry, maybe my english is failing me here. what i was getting at is that using ai feels like gambling to me, where tokens, time, etc. are wagered against the chance for desired output. the risk is that you waste your tokens/time, and the prize is a useful answer (if not the exact code/solution/whatever one was hoping for) i wasn’t trying to convince you, i’m just explaining that this is gambling in a meaningful sens…

I agree with the other commenter. Your English is perfectly good. Your subjective experience is your own and I can’t disagree with that.

I’m working from a place where my employer pays for my tokens so I’m also not spending anything except my time. Maybe if I were, it would feel more like gambling.

Re: Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

#433

Post by doc_ick »

nonethewiser wrote: post #363
paimapi wrote: post #267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's best read as a humorous piece of creative fiction and you can employ your suspension of disbelief for this ride

>I think it's best read as a humorous piece of creative fiction and you can employ your suspension of disbelief for this ride But what is the point of the fiction, if not that its relatable? Is it supposed to mirror some fictional reality that the author is relieved we dont live in? Or is it supposed to parody real life? I think its supposed to parody reality, but I don’t see the resemblance.

From my history with llms, this exaggerated example does hit home a bit too close for comfort.

Re: Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

#434

Post by kloop »

torginus wrote: post #334
cruffle_duffle wrote: post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Plus rigorously ensuring backwards compatibility for a project that is 2 hours old and has zero users." That is exactly how the slop accretes and you get a pile of crap. Claude somehow assumes that said 2 hour old userless app is some dusty enterprise app with millions of users and billions of dollars at stake for a 1 second outage. I have to constantly have these things "take a deep breath, step back and look at th…

Which, again, if you attempt to use these LLMs in an actual enterprise project with the assorted legacy mess in it, that does have to have backwards compatiblity, and interacts with 'weird' tech (well, weird to full stack Node/React devs), well it's an exercise in frustration.

Which makes sense.

In a conversation about code, the most likely answer is often some comment about backwards compatibility.

In a conversation about a legacy enterprise app, the most likely answer is often going completely insane

Re: Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

#435

Post by bot403 »

emilfihlman wrote: post #422
tsukikage wrote: post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Realise that you are talking to some mathematics in a box. You can't get a rise out of it. It cannot feel guilt or remorse. Whatever emotional payoff one might want from "I asked for ONE button" cannot be had here. Meanwhile, not only are you being charged by the word, but every word you send that is not directly on the path to getting what you want done is just noise in the maths getting in your way. So leave emotio…

Except you are missing an important aspect: the model includes training data that responds to THIS IS FUCKING WRONG, after which highly likely follows correction patterns and working solutions. Ie, actually, yes, shouting at the AI can (and does, there are papers on this), work.

Anyone remember the gpt-3 era where adding "this is important to my job" and "if this is wrong someone dies" to prompts made a measurable improvement in accuracy and reduced hallucinations?

Re: Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

#436

Post by bot403 »

blake__dev wrote: post #227
johnisgood wrote: post #135

> Why is half the site blue now? I asked you to change one button. > Half the site is blue. I asked for ONE button. Those are my only options when the site is clearly not blue, two buttons are. There is a reason for why I am much more specific than this.

Yeah that's when the site lost me too. I feel like people just tell AI "make the thing" and then get mad when it doesn't match up to their vision that they didn't specify at all.

This is a succinct summary of most the the profession of software engineering. Just replace AI with "programmers".

Re: Claude, change the “Add to Cart” button to blue

#437

Post by Terr_ »

croo wrote: post #177
bmacho wrote: post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. People have an inner monologue, partial results and ideas and they remember that. If they've worked some minutes/hours/weeks on something and you ask them why did they do that, they will either answer honestly and truthfully, lie, or say "I missed that/didn't seem important so I just chose something at random". None of these cases are similar to how AI works.

Actually split brain experiments tells a different story. The left hemisphere actively confabulates, inventing plausible explanations for actions it didn’t initiate, suggesting that much of human self-narrative may be post-hoc storytelling.

Perhaps, but it's also a rather questionable achievement: We've already had several decades of program-output that can match humans with literal brain damage.

If anything, biological comparisons should make us cautious. Consider the vast gulf that still exists between the finest artificial organ/limb versus the OEM parts of natural nanobots.

Post reply on HN