Live data from Hacker News

Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

courtlistener.com

431–440 of 485 posts

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#431

I have seen so many violent threats and incitements on Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, and Instagram over the last 5 years that Parler could possibly make the case that they've been singled out, but I doubt it. They're just too unsympathetic of a plaintiff, imho. That said, antitrust battles against Big Tech will dominate the next four years of economic policy, and rightfully so. GAFA is too big, too powerful, too manip…

The core difference is every other platform at least attempts to moderate and remove violent content, whereas Parker is created explicitly to publish that content.

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#432
post #418

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I strongly disagree with Rowling's bizarre obsession but she faced months of death threats while Twitter looked the other way.

She was receiving death threats on Twitter and Twitter was not taking action against those users? Do you have any sources for that?

https://twitter.com/dataracer117/status/1272737061703790592?...

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#433
post #419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet 4chan has succeeded in may organized tasks. They played capture the flag with Shia LaBeouf [1], fixed votes for NYTs person of the year [2], and made the OK hand signal into a White Power symbol [3]. Sure these aren't super involved, but it's a bit dismissive to say they aren't capable of organized efforts. [1]: https://www.vice.com/en/article/d7eddj/4chan-does-first-good... [2]: https://techcrunch.com/2009/04/21…

Organise anything like this . The difference between the Capitol thing and the stuff 4chan gets up to is that the protests like this require a critical mass of not only people but belief - the former is possible on 4chan, but the latter needs some kind of consistent identity to rally around.

I guess you're right in that I am trivializing the organization of a this level of violent protest. Thanks for highlighting that :)

(smiley face for sincerity, no sarcasm or wit intended)

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#434
post #356
post #306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good point, I had forgotten that Rob of Errata Security was given an email to verify and it was proven to be legitimate: > So as I blogged before, the emails contained DKIM information, which the original reporters could and should have verified. So I eventually got a copy of the email and run DKIM verification on it. It passed: https://twitter.com/erratarob/status/1322007153415200768 I think he's pretty active (and…

Strange that Rob doesn't mention the possibility that the private key was compromised. What the DKIM signature really proves is the date the message was sent, not who composed the message.

I agree that is a possibility, but he probably didn't mention it because it's so remote. When you have someone's laptop with a bunch of private sexual photos, reams of PII and emails, and you can verify with witnesses and crypto that the emails check out, the rational explanation is "maybe the laptop is real" rather than "maybe Google got hacked six years ago and the extremely valuable private keys were saved for this".

That is, I do agree with you and your technical analysis, but don't see the point of nitpicking his Twitter reporting. I think if you're on Twitter, you already know that you're not getting every little detail of a story.

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#435
post #422
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let’s be clear, access to cloud computing companies like AWS is a competitive advantage because it requires less upfront capital and less engineering time to manage. I can 100% see why Parler would prefer having access to AWS compared to running their own hardware. Ianal, so I can’t judge the merits of this legal case. To be honest I’m surprised Parler can find lawyers willing to bring it to court on their behalf, or…

“I’m surprised Parler can find lawyers willing to bring it to court on their behalf, or banks willing to process transactions to pay said lawyers.” Personally, I am surprised at the opposite. That a company cannot find lawyers to defend their position or process payments from their customers without due process is horrible. The fact that you were not surprised by it is quite worrisome. I don’t mean that as a personal…

I think you misunderstand me. I was surprised that the domino effect started with Parler, but that was several days ago. Now I’m surprised that the domino effect hasn’t reached everyone they do business with.

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#436
post #364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a big difference between protesting and domestic terrorism.

I'd count burning down a police station as domestic terrorism.

Which was done by a "Boogalo Boi", not an antifa or BLM.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/23/texas-boogaloo...

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#437
post #363

1). AWS can suspend service for any customer immediately upon giving that customer notice. They do not have to provide a "remediation period" or give the customer any grace time at all. Every customer agrees to this as part of the AWS Customer Agreement 2). AWS can terminate an account immediately if they deem you in violation of their policies instead of a suspension - as was the case with Parler. It's all in the AW…

If that is so, why would any company that has a critical business utilize these cloud services? For example, a 911 emergency software provider, a law enforcement agency, a hospital or other medical organization, political organizations, religious organization, or any other organization that either has critical services to deploy or may get caught in the crosshairs of a political movement. I think given these events c…

> companies should reassess the risk of using these cloud services

Absolutely! If the horror stories of companies losing access to their accounts due to automated processes going haywire haven't convinced us that "cloud risk" is real, perhaps this incident with Parler will focus our minds to this possibility.

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#438
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you sure about that? I almost sure I read somewhere that Parler has a policy that prohibits incitement of violence.

The policy means nothing if it isn't applied and a lot of what happened on Wednesday (and way worse) was planned in the open on Parler. Parler's moderation also principally consisted from what I've heard of community 'jury of peers' where a reported post was shown to ~5 other users who decided if it was a violation which is incredibly insufficient and basically guarantees the policy will not be enforced.

It wasn't applied instantly? Was there some specific deadline they did not meet? Because Twitter does not remove bad things instantly either.

Re: Parler LLC vs. Amazon Web Services Inc

#439
post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Twitter and Facebook have extensive systems for keeping the various horrors in check. They are not as good as I think they should be. But they're miles better than what Parler had, which was more of a fig leaf.” If Twitter and Facebook (being multibillion dollar companies with a decade or more to build these algorithms) haven’t solve this problem yet, how can any upstart possibly compete with them? They’d be shut do…

Being smaller they can and should user human moderation. Twitter and Facebook have problems because of the huge number of posts. Parler is still small enough that then _can_ moderate.

Facebook is in a way better position financially to use human moderators than something like Parler is. Sure, Parler has orders of magnitude less volume. They also have orders of magnitude less money. Facebook can afford to hire 1,000 human moderators for every 1 human moderator Parler hires.

This whole "Parler can be better than Facebook because they are smaller" argument is just as illogical as it sounds.

Post reply on HN