Live data from Hacker News

The Coming Food Catastrophe

economist.com

421–430 of 634 posts

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#421
post #415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a major fuel shortage so you are just robbing peter to pay Paul. Also fertiliser will be the next problem, we won't be able to grow enough to cover the loss of Russian and Ukraine exports next year. And meat as a source of protein will become a luxury for all those in power. The western government's had to know this would happen otherwise they are grossly incompetent at their job. If the west had had the mea…

> Russia have played this very very well as the west followed their own play book to the letter and the russians had counters planned for years, hording gold, setting up non USD financial systems. First round of The Game goes to Russia imo. I find this very hard to believe. Things are much worse in Russia and for Russia than they are in Europe or the United States right now, with the future looking bleak.

Really? can you quantify what that means, are they going hungry, short of fuel, is their currency collapsing, do they have rampant inflation? Or is just that people that got us in this mess are telling you that some how russians are suffering so much that they have to give up. Wasn't that suppose to happen immediately upon the weaponisation of the USD? When will it happen, after we all starve, after all infrastructure in Ukraine is destroyed? To believe that narrative now is beyond my imagination.

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is like asking how fungible are calories. People with the means to mill and cook with wheat flour can probably manage with corn too if the alternative is starvation.

I don't mean on the consumption side. I mean on the production side. Do they grow in the same soil? Do they take the same nutrients? Do they have the same water / sunlight / temperature band tolerances? Looks like that rotation is pretty common but there are some details to concern oneself with. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/considerations-whe...

[deleted]

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it can be used for that, but it is also used to cut gasoline and therefore make a single barrel of oil go further. Normally ethanol is less than 10 percent, but I think it can be as high as 15 or 20 percent at the pump right now. Modern engines can handle it just fine, but it does slightly reduce fuel economy.

It's also an oxygenation agent, and replaces MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether) which ... oh, also substituted for tetraethyl lead. (I thought MTBE was an anti-smog treatment.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTBE_controversy MTBE turned out to leach into groundwater quite readily and there was a pretty widespread outcry about it in the early aughts. Again, ethanol is a replacement (mentioned in the Wikipedia article above…

Wow, I had no idea. I thought ethanol was just because farm lobby and a poor attempt at climate mitigation.

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[dead]

This guy has a vested interest in convincing people we’re in for a rough year or two.

I don't see them selling anything, just a Patreon and some referral links. If that's considered some dark ulterior motive, then you also wouldn't be able to trust most youtubers (Veritasium, CPG Grey, MinutePhysics, etc)

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#425
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Because at some point the West will have to sit at the negotiating table with Russia. Do they? What does Russia have that will force them to the negotiating table? The damage to this years harvest is already done and the supply chains will likely have figured themselves out by next year

If the US accrues enough "Oh, we don't talk to _those people_, we only sanction them" world states, they will encompass enough of the world's population to make it unreasonable for third parties to obey US sanctions, which they currently tend to (because the US sanctions transitively); and enough of the world's population to do things like replace SWIFT and/or drop the USD as their main reserve currency. (Also, there…

this seems like nebulous FUD that attempts to downplay that one of the actors here is literally engaging in a genocide

will the world (NOT the U.S., as the opposition to Russia's genocidal war is global) accrue enough countries out of 200 or so which engage in genocidal invasions of conquest of their neighbors in the 21st century? sounds implausible

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#426

The article actually has four solutions at the bottom. Compared to the severity of the problem, all four solutions are surprisingly simple. Not necessarily easy, but simple and straightforward. 1. Stop using so much corn to make ethanol. 2. Stop using so much seed oil to make biodiesel. 3. Stop feeding so much food to livestock. Bonus: reducing the livestock population provides short term calories! 4. Break the Black…

>1. Stop using so much corn to make ethanol. >2. Stop using so much seed oil to make biodiesel. Easier said than done when there's a global fuel shortage too!

It would be partially offset by the higher fuel economy you'd get without ethanol in fuel.

"Ethanol contains about one-third less energy than gasoline. So, vehicles will typically go 3% to 4% fewer miles per gallon on E10 and 4% to 5% fewer on E15 than on 100% gasoline." [0]

I think Ethanol in gas is stupid and I always tank up with E0 when I can (it's available in some parts of New Hampshire... not sure about your state).

[0] https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#427
post #391

The article actually has four solutions at the bottom. Compared to the severity of the problem, all four solutions are surprisingly simple. Not necessarily easy, but simple and straightforward. 1. Stop using so much corn to make ethanol. 2. Stop using so much seed oil to make biodiesel. 3. Stop feeding so much food to livestock. Bonus: reducing the livestock population provides short term calories! 4. Break the Black…

I live ridiculously frugal in a emerging economy country. It's not that I actively look to drop out of consumption, it's just that I lifestyle seemed to settle on this way of being. My entire cost of living is probably less than the cost of ownership of my small truck back home. I don't consume things which use corn as an ingredient. I don't use seed oils. My food is mostly wild fish (local markets.) If Russia were u…

In the spirit of "no reason": It's theorized that a nuclear war anywhere on the planet would be ecologically devasting for human life everywhere.

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#428

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This doesn't really make any sense though. It changes nothing about the geopolitical reality of what's going on. If the US sends a merchant ship and a cruiser, what is russia going to do exactly? Try to bomb the ships? They will lose, and get shot down. Why would it suddenly be WWIII? Is russia really going to say "Well, they shot down our plane so its global thermonuclear war time".

"Is russia really going to say "Well, they shot down our plane so its global thermonuclear war time"." That is what they have been threatening...

in that case, it would be russia starting ww3, and I don't think they will.

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#429

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Make up your mind - it is either in Syria or ... where? 500kt is not a small amount

that question is for putin to answer – where did he take it?

to Syria

if you have different info - please share

Re: The Coming Food Catastrophe

#430
post #396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I‘d rather die trying, than live in a non-free world. And fyi, whatever arrangement of characters your reply to this statement will consist of, it will not change my stance, so do not bother.

>"I‘d rather die trying, than live in a non-free world." Well many people went to Ukraine to fight on their side. If that is what you do why would anyone bother "changing your stance". Just go and do it. But if you expect other people to perish in WWIII for the sake your stance they might hold a different opinion about that part.

those other people choose to, as they would rather vaporize than give an inch of their land to russia

if you expect them to surrender or accept less, well, you'll have to make your case to them

Post reply on HN