Live data from Hacker News

Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

znak.com

421–428 of 428 posts

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#421
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The question is less about NATO deployments and more the will of NATO leadership to go to war with Russia over its more minor members. I hate to say it but the Afghanistan withdrawal really showed what happens when Americans stop giving a shit, and they probably don't give that much of a shit about Latvia. Who's going to step into that gap for NATO? Poland recently ran a military exercise simulating a war with Russia…

What rational reason would Russia have to invade the Baltic States (or even for example Poland)? Even in best case scenario if the west does not directly intervene, they would get an additional few million people almost all of whom absolutely don't want to live in Russia and whom Russia could barely afford to police and a lot of additional economic sanctions. Also we're totally ignoring the internal political fallout…

I can see a valid reason for Ukrainian annexation - just for its agricultural output alone. Russia is possibly having a food problem.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#422
post #398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FSVO held off. All Finnish territory claimed by USSR at the beginning of the conflict was in the end annexed and remains so to this day.

Certainly kept more than half the country. Here's hoping Ukraine prevails as well.

Amen.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#423
post #39

I observe the Ukrainian drama for many years. I strongly suspect that the actual game maybe the opposite of the picture in the media. Ukraine is looted to the bone and the economy is in downward spiral. The beneficiaries of the looting may need a war to write it all off. Meanwhile, if Putin takes Ukraine, he would shoulder a giant pile of debt, plus the responsibility for everything that happens. So the actual game m…

Okay, have you ever been to Ukraine? What does it mean - looted to the bone? Why do you think Ukraine is that much different to Russia? Ukraine GDP is improving from 2016 till now, even with pandemic. Some industries, like software and agriculture are growing at a great rate. Yet, some guy who watches Russian TV is painting absurd picture Again, you don't know how external debt works, debt had nothing to do with coll…

Wow

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just to be clear, you are dismissing the words of the guy who actually was in the room when some of these assurances were given. You may find the accounts from two Ambassadors presented in this write-up interesting: https://transatlanticrelations.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/1... Here's the direct quote from Ambassador Braithwaite's letter. Braithwaite was UK’s Ambassador to the Soviet Union and Russia until 1992. The…

I repeat, it's a myth, started to be perpetuated since putin https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/05/myths-and-misconception...

As someone who live in Russia and who lived there in 90th I can confirm that this is what Gorbachev publicly announced that time. Putin has nothing to do with this. Perhaps he use this broken promise in his speeches but he has not invented it.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#425
post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That isn't how fault works. None of the misfortune I've suffered in my life would have happened if my father had never impregnated my mother, therefore it's all his fault and I'm his victim? No. "But for" causation has zero moral import whatsoever. Stop spewing your ax-grindy propaganda.

So essentially your claim is that invading a country is not the cause for subsequent million victims of said invasion. You still don't see it, do you? You have been brainwashed into believing that war mongering is somehow not pure evil as long as it's done by US.

My claim is that people are responsible for their own actions. Kindly stop defending ISIS. Thanks.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#426
post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So essentially your claim is that invading a country is not the cause for subsequent million victims of said invasion. You still don't see it, do you? You have been brainwashed into believing that war mongering is somehow not pure evil as long as it's done by US.

My claim is that people are responsible for their own actions. Kindly stop defending ISIS. Thanks.

How is ISIS different from Americans droning random civilians?

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#427
post #371
post #227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope... no battalions in Iceland.

Perhaps the comment was edited, but there is no wording in the current post that states battlegroups are in Iceland just that Iceland contributes to battlegroups in other countries.

Well... tis true that there is a mine clearing group to deal with the occasional mine that drifts in from the old WW2 mine fields in the North Atlantic. And they did send one of them over to participate in the Gulf War...

https://www.icelandreview.com/news/iceland-featured-the-dail...

...but there are still no battalions in Iceland. There isn't even a permanent US air base any more, they cleared out in the 2000´s.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#428
post #426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My claim is that people are responsible for their own actions. Kindly stop defending ISIS. Thanks.

How is ISIS different from Americans droning random civilians?

That is not something that happens. There are American mistakes. There are incompetent Americans. There are even malicious Americans. But U.S. drone strikes are not random and the U.S. vigorously prosecutes war crimes violations by its own soldiers.

If you want to criticize, say, President Trump for his actions in the Gallagher case, that would be entirely fair. But it doesn't change the fact that he was prosecuted in the first place. There is no ISIS analogy to the Gallagher prosecution. Indeed, no other nation does as good a job as the U.S. does. I say this as a Marine judge advocate who stood in the face of immense pressure by an Australian "leftenant colonel" who wanted to cover up an unintended CIVCAS by joint forces.

Post reply on HN