Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Purely AI written systems will scale to a point of complexity that no human can ever understand I think it will be needless verbose complexity. I kind of imagine someone having an unlimited budget of free amazon stuff shipped to their house. In theory, they are living a prosperous life of plenty. In reality, they will be drowning in something that isn't prosperity.
I don't understand this point of view at all. There's a symmetry that is going entirely unappreciated by most of the comments in the thread: just as I can give Claude X,000 words of text to use to describe the code I want it to write, I can also give it some existing code and ask for X,000 words of text explaining what it does. (Call it, oh, I don't know, a "spec," maybe.) The explanation, in turn, can be fed back to…
Some people are mindful about what they get and don't get from amazon and don't die from prosperity. ("you might use AI to increase your prosperity")
the rest of the world eats too much and dies of heart disease/diabetes. ("the rest of the world will flounder more and AI will do more stuff to them than for them")