Then there's just a list of comments and one can vote them up or down on the content of the comment. Ok I did say it was weird.
EDIT: Some great counterpoints below. I agree with them. This is a bad idea.
41–50 of 327 posts
Then there's just a list of comments and one can vote them up or down on the content of the comment. Ok I did say it was weird.
EDIT: Some great counterpoints below. I agree with them. This is a bad idea.
Also, like some others , I like know if something I've posted was particularly liked (or not).
And I've been skimming pages looking for the high-karma comments to try to dig out what are likely to be the most worthwhile comments. I suppose there's some feedback effect in place there, as popular comments simply get more attention (and so likely garner more up-votes votes), but there's pragmatic value in having a metric to selectively peruse a post with so much to read. (And, no, ZapRead isn't the answer :) )
Wow, this interferes with key elements of my system for voting/commenting on HN. Here are some things that don't work now: * If a comment is sitting at 1 or 0, I'll try to avoid downvoting it unless I really think the comment subtracts value from the site. * If a child is attracting more votes than the parent, and I think this is because the child commenter didn't comprehend what the parent was saying, I vote to leve…