Experiment: No Comment Scores
31–40 of 327 posts
Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have noticed things changing around too. I hear there is this thing called a "dev server"...
I usually do development on my local machine, but for small things like this I use the server's repl.
I don't trust myself not to kill my app with a live REPL :)
Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#33I think this is very nice because karma isn't really worth anything and comments that are popular still get to be seen without the mob mentality to vote them up
Now you don't really know if people like your work or not, so why bother contributing?
(I know why: "because someone is wrong on the Internet!" But it is nice to get some karma too, :)
Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#34Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#35Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#36I didn't realize how much I was affected by the comment ratings until they went away. Commencing cognitive restructuring.
Indeed. Interesting how fast the brain adapts. I just caught myself looking at the total score and trying to predict which comment is getting upvoted (since I see the total increasing). And I don't even care about comment score!
Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#37Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#38Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#39And here I was, thinking firefox was screwing up the JS. I guess this should improve the quality of discussions a lot, since a lot of people tend to just skim the few comments at the top. Not displaying the comment scores might make them read more.
I don't think this'll stop people from just skimming the top. But, it will stop them from finding those highly rated comments hidden by a low rated parent comment.
Re: Experiment: No Comment Scores
#40* If a comment is sitting at 1 or 0, I'll try to avoid downvoting it unless I really think the comment subtracts value from the site.
* If a child is attracting more votes than the parent, and I think this is because the child commenter didn't comprehend what the parent was saying, I vote to level out the comments.
* If I see a comment sitting in negative territory that I feel should only be a 0 or 1 because it wasn't that bad, I'll upvote it even if I otherwise wouldn't have.
* If a thread is already dominated by a couple of high-scoring comments, relative to its age, I'm less likely to post a new top level comment. My feeling is that if a good comment just sits at the bottom because it arrived slightly too late, I've only added noise to the thread. The lack of visible points makes it much harder to gauge how a new comment will 'compete' on the thread.
* If the scores indicate that something is being widely misunderstood, I might comment where I otherwise would not have to try to restore sanity.
Of course, if this change were to stick, it would alter the character of the site, and we would all develop new voting and commenting systems. I can already tell that this change magnifies my tendency to vote with an eye toward reordering comments rather than voting on each comment in relative isolation.