Live data from Hacker News

Oculus founder didn’t expect “so many death threats” after Facebook deal

arstechnica.com

41–45 of 45 posts

Re: Oculus founder didn’t expect “so many death threats” after Facebook deal

#41
post #32
post #6

Death threats are obviously inexcusable. This shouldn't even have to be said. But this is a classic PR strategy. When you do something that makes many people very angry, all you have to do is wait for someone to say something incivil. Then make headlines with whatever it is they said. Then the message shifts to how you've been wronged. And any time anyone complains or argues against what you did, associate the critic…

I don't agree with this at all. I am a person. I have never had a death threat. If I get a death threat, I would probably be rather upset, and inclined to say something about it. I don't think there is too much else going on here.

Then you've done nothing controversial on the Internet.

Death threats are simply background noise. As a hosting provider I don't think a day goes by we don't get one about something or other from some crazy. Most of these people send these off with about as much care as folks post on 4chan, and really don't put much weight behind the words they are typing.

Used to bother me, but you get over it pretty quick. Cost of business of doing anything that gets even a remotely large following on the Internet, bonus points if you get some controversy.

Re: Oculus founder didn’t expect “so many death threats” after Facebook deal

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What, precisely, is it that you think they don't understand (and a bunch of random gamers do)?

I think they're turning a blind eye to the way many people view Facebook, Facebook's habit of making decisions that compromise user privacy (since that's how they make money), and so on because it's in their financial advantage to be bought out like that. Zuckerberg's comments about potential paths that VR will take (with Facebook's backing) already admit that he's planning many of the things that people are saying t…

And those potential paths are things that people have been talking about since,... well, since VR was a runt puppy that only some kid named Jaron loved. The gaming community has a very parochial, blinkered view of what the technology promises. Frankly, the last game I was even mildly interested in was Q*bert, but the promise of immersive VR worlds of every kind - especially social - excites the hell out of me.

Re: Oculus founder didn’t expect “so many death threats” after Facebook deal

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because crazy people generally don't know what an Oculus is? You have to be an early adopter, independently rich and well-enough off to be involved in a super early-stage company at the dev kit/vision stage. Also, you have to be supportive of a new enterprise, both in deed and with actual dollars. It is very hard to imagine any of them turning around and making a death threat to an employee's family member. It's just…

Your premise is wrong, as another commentator pointed out. If anything, there's an above average correlation between the early adopter tech crowd and crazy people who drastically overreact to news of things. Also, because of things like Minecraft associations, a widely popular Kickstarter (which generated news), and the general media love of new technologies (such as VR), I think more people are aware of Oculus than…

Sure, but I didn't mean insane overreactions on blogs, twitter, and hackernews. I meant actual credible threats from real crazy people.

Re: Oculus founder didn’t expect “so many death threats” after Facebook deal

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because crazy people generally don't know what an Oculus is? You have to be an early adopter, independently rich and well-enough off to be involved in a super early-stage company at the dev kit/vision stage. Also, you have to be supportive of a new enterprise, both in deed and with actual dollars. It is very hard to imagine any of them turning around and making a death threat to an employee's family member. It's just…

[citation needed] The corollary of Sturgeon's law is that there is a significant portion of everything which is so crap that you wouldn't believe it actually exists. The more people you have interested in any subject (flowers, stamps, virtual reality equipment), the more likely it is that you have "crazy people" who become emotionally attached to a particular product and react quite irrationally to any news about the…

Right, even you personally for example (manicdee) might well become so emotionally attached to something that you might literally type what amounts to a death threat were certain things to transpire. Even your name is "manicdee", which doesn't exactly scream mental stability. On the other hand that wouldn't be a credible death threat or anything to be afraid of. You're just some normal guy (in my estimation.)

Re: Oculus founder didn’t expect “so many death threats” after Facebook deal

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your premise is wrong, as another commentator pointed out. If anything, there's an above average correlation between the early adopter tech crowd and crazy people who drastically overreact to news of things. Also, because of things like Minecraft associations, a widely popular Kickstarter (which generated news), and the general media love of new technologies (such as VR), I think more people are aware of Oculus than…

Sure, but I didn't mean insane overreactions on blogs, twitter, and hackernews. I meant actual credible threats from real crazy people.

I mean legitimately insane, whether or not the threats are credible.
Post reply on HN