41–44 of 44 posts
Does anyone else find it disingenuous that their homepage has the words "Welcome to Rosa Labs" backed by a stock photo of what must be a much larger lab? I doubt their "labs" look anything like that.
If that isn't actually their lab, yes, that's extremely disingenuous, and potentially even actionable.
Does anyone else find it disingenuous that their homepage has the words "Welcome to Rosa Labs" backed by a stock photo of what must be a much larger lab? I doubt their "labs" look anything like that.
If the team thinks they can make a food product without nutritionists or doctors, they should just a picture of themselves on the front page.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good point. Startups can get away with using stock photography to show the use cases for their product, but it does seem a little questionable to have stock photos for a science-based company like this to use stock photos of a space that probably isn't theirs, and a 'guy-looking-into-microscope' that probably doesn't work there.
Small tech companies use stock data center photography all of the time. It's usually kind of tacky honestly, but is it really that different?