41–50 of 80 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?
If so, it's a clever strategic move as they know that most of their competition will struggle to allow such a policy because they can't move so fast on such morally loaded topics like OAI.
"Now that we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues and have new tools" Huh? Quite the statement when there are still people out there having parasocial relationships with chatbots. This problem is going to get exponentially worse when the chatbots can start to get sexual.
>> "ChatGPT is trained to direct people to seek professional help," such as the 988 suicide and crisis hotline in the US or the Samaritans in the UK.
>> The company acknowledged, however, that "there have been moments where our systems did not behave as intended in sensitive situations".
You have to pay some respect to sama. Imagine this move done by Google, Meta, Amazon or Microsoft: It won't happen.
Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?
Yeap, it's started... https://www.johnlennox.org/shop/24/2084-artificial-intellige...
FYI: Christian worldview
Does 'the Christian worldview' invalidate any conclusions the authors may present?
OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?
> Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages Hey! How old are you!?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?
Typically not a good sign when a company resorts to selling porn. Didn't work well for Tumblr, not working well for Twitter, maybe AI is different.
Presumably this will just be part of that offering.
OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Always a new account with some snarky neo-luddite reply, as if Google, or Facebook, or Microsoft, or Amazon, doesn't already know everything there is to know about you. I mean, come on. That ship has sailed at least two decades ago and this kind of conversation simply isn't productive imo.
This is a ridiculous attitude, exactly equivalent to 'if you've nothing to fear you've nothing to hide'. In practice different geographic localities (e.g.: EU, California) have far different (and improving) limits on the personal information that can be stored by companies and how it is used. Various forms of online hygiene, from ad blocking to VPNs, to anonymous email accounts are likely utilised by the hacker news…
Quite the contrary. My attitude encourages one to actually solve problems that we are encountering today, and not to fight battles that were lost two decades ago, which was the main thrust of my argument.
Also, as someone born in the Eastern Bloc, please allow me to throw up in my mouth at a publication that unironically cites the Communist Manifesto.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why desperate? There's clearly a demand for it.
He literally said on the August podcast that they wouldn’t do it because it would be a short-term gimmick. As I type, CNBC (who pumps them every hour of the day) is talking about how suspicious it looks.
Maybe he just looked at their analytics and saw that everyone is trying to have virtual sex with it?