Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't know Hyundai corporate defenders were so unrealistic and childish.
I don't even like Hyundai. What's "unrealistic and childish" is expecting free labour.
Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
41–50 of 225 posts
Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#42https://www.rtl-sdr.com/flipperzero-darkweb-firmware-bypasse...
Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also frustrating but for different reasons: > in 2023 over the “Kia Boyz” attacks that allowed thieves to bypass a vehicle’s security system using a USB cable. The USB cable happened to have the right size to engage the starter mechanism. Any physical object with similar dimensions could have been used. It really undercuts how absolutely terrible the Kia security design was around that component.
In some vehicles, their "software fix" literally did nothing but move thieves from smashing a window to screwdriver'ing the driver door lock. More work for the thieves, but hardly a fix to inspire confidence.
Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
In some vehicles, their "software fix" literally did nothing but move thieves from smashing a window to screwdriver'ing the driver door lock. More work for the thieves, but hardly a fix to inspire confidence.
This is why, back when I owned a Jeep, I never locked it. Figured if someone wanted the 85 cents in change that badly I'd rather they not take a knife to my (plastic) windows.
Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#45Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#46Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#47[flagged]
You missed some points 1. This is only in the UK, they are not doing the same in the US 2. Recalls are the responsibility of the manufacturer. Security lapses, even if "up to standards" at the time are not a legitimate exemption (imo)
Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
In some vehicles, their "software fix" literally did nothing but move thieves from smashing a window to screwdriver'ing the driver door lock. More work for the thieves, but hardly a fix to inspire confidence.
This is why, back when I owned a Jeep, I never locked it. Figured if someone wanted the 85 cents in change that badly I'd rather they not take a knife to my (plastic) windows.
Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#49Re: Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
#50“Gameboy-like device” - are they referring to Flipper Zeros with the firmware to exploit RF rolling codes? https://www.rtl-sdr.com/flipperzero-darkweb-firmware-bypasse...