I use a slow cellular connection and noticed some apple service (I could never figure out which one, even after installing an outgoing firewall) was aggressively uploading some large blob every time the mac woke from sleep, which made the whole connection useless for up to half an hour. At some point, apple must've fixed this "bug", but the experience -- and apple's increasingly obtrusive software -- convinced me to…
My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
41–50 of 218 posts
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#42Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#43What is the problem with this?
When Microsoft does it - most evil thing ever. Literally Satan.
When Apple does it - it's good, or at least benign. It's what the user expects.
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why use Apple at all if it’s so user-hostile? (I’m a Windows user.)
Why use Apple or Windows at all if they are so user-hostile? (I’m a Linux user.)
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#45Honestly, the list looks legit. Computers nowadays are semi-remotely-managed appliances. Internet is presumed, offline is not first, and offline is absolutely not exclusive. >I have been trying to minimize to the extent possible the reach of big tech into my life. I don't think this goal is possible, or worthwhile, on a big tech offering like a Mac + macOS. It can certainly be tried, but the user needs to be prepared…
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#46What is the problem with this?
It's the problem with the benevolent dictator. It's no problem as long as the dictator is benevolent. Also benevolence is a matter of reference. Something that might be ok for most, might not be for you. There is also the question of ownership. Do you really own something you bought if you don't control its behaviour? Is it even moral to sell stuff to customers if they won't fully own it, or if the nature of ownershi…
do you think it is a problem that the "benevolent dictator" operating system contacts an endpoint to keep its anti-malware list up to date?
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#47Little Snitch can detect and block connections at the process level. https://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#48It's even better that quite a few of those connections are unencrypted (and are actively used by some vendors to profile devices).
The only point where this is not the case would be system probes, such as captive-portal check, OCSP, or NTP, but none of these would be capable of portraying anything more than simple metadata, like your ip address.
Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#49Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the problem with the benevolent dictator. It's no problem as long as the dictator is benevolent. Also benevolence is a matter of reference. Something that might be ok for most, might not be for you. There is also the question of ownership. Do you really own something you bought if you don't control its behaviour? Is it even moral to sell stuff to customers if they won't fully own it, or if the nature of ownershi…
thanks that is just a random rant do you think it is a problem that the "benevolent dictator" operating system contacts an endpoint to keep its anti-malware list up to date?