Live data from Hacker News

My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

appaddict.app

41–50 of 218 posts

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#41

I use a slow cellular connection and noticed some apple service (I could never figure out which one, even after installing an outgoing firewall) was aggressively uploading some large blob every time the mac woke from sleep, which made the whole connection useless for up to half an hour. At some point, apple must've fixed this "bug", but the experience -- and apple's increasingly obtrusive software -- convinced me to…

My Macbook used to grind CPU for 10-20 minutes after every power on. That happened with literally fresh install and it does it every time. I don't know why does it do that. May be some indexing? This lack of transparency was one of the reasons for me switching to Linux too. I don't want my OS to do anything at all in background, that I didn't explicitly configured to. I want to be in full control of my software. Linux is far from perfect, but much better.

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why use Apple at all if it’s so user-hostile? (I’m a Windows user.)

Why use Apple or Windows at all if they are so user-hostile? (I’m a Linux user.)

(Bluetooth) audio never works consistently for me on Linux, especially after wake from sleep I have like a 10% chance to get crackling/stuttering

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#45

Honestly, the list looks legit. Computers nowadays are semi-remotely-managed appliances. Internet is presumed, offline is not first, and offline is absolutely not exclusive. >I have been trying to minimize to the extent possible the reach of big tech into my life. I don't think this goal is possible, or worthwhile, on a big tech offering like a Mac + macOS. It can certainly be tried, but the user needs to be prepared…

[deleted]

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#46
post #24

What is the problem with this?

It's the problem with the benevolent dictator. It's no problem as long as the dictator is benevolent. Also benevolence is a matter of reference. Something that might be ok for most, might not be for you. There is also the question of ownership. Do you really own something you bought if you don't control its behaviour? Is it even moral to sell stuff to customers if they won't fully own it, or if the nature of ownershi…

thanks that is just a random rant

do you think it is a problem that the "benevolent dictator" operating system contacts an endpoint to keep its anti-malware list up to date?

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#48

It's even better that quite a few of those connections are unencrypted (and are actively used by some vendors to profile devices).

From my understanding this isnt correct. While a DNS resolution may or may not be encrypted, which is highly dependent on the local client's environment. Data being sent to apple is not being sent via DNS, as these DNS connections are only the beginning of negotiating a conneciton to Apple's servers. The connections themselves where data is transfered, are negotiated using TLS and thus encrypted.

The only point where this is not the case would be system probes, such as captive-portal check, OCSP, or NTP, but none of these would be capable of portraying anything more than simple metadata, like your ip address.

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#50
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the problem with the benevolent dictator. It's no problem as long as the dictator is benevolent. Also benevolence is a matter of reference. Something that might be ok for most, might not be for you. There is also the question of ownership. Do you really own something you bought if you don't control its behaviour? Is it even moral to sell stuff to customers if they won't fully own it, or if the nature of ownershi…

thanks that is just a random rant do you think it is a problem that the "benevolent dictator" operating system contacts an endpoint to keep its anti-malware list up to date?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN