Live data from Hacker News

Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

battlefieldanomalies.com

41–47 of 47 posts

Re: Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

#41

Missing Gallipoli (Peter Weir - 1981) I went to Uni with a mature age guy who was one of the extras for the army. If I remember correctly he was ADF reserves at the time.

During the cold war countries had vast standing armies. The Netherlands had 1000 tanks!

Without the draft getting 5000 extras for your film would be way too expensive.

Re: Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

#42
post #10

[flagged]

Surely you have to draw a line somewhere, though? Adolf Hitler was a painter and Kim Il-Jong directed movies. Neither of them was any good, but if they had been, would it really make sense to judge their art in isolation, without the slightest mention of the authors’ tyranny and mass murder? Griffith made movies that he fully intended as Ku Klux Klan propaganda. That is not in doubt. At the same time these movies are…

[dead]

Re: Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

#43

How about a space battle scene with and without CGI? Compare "The Dam Busters" from 1955 with propeller airplanes to "A New Hope" with X-wings, title says 1977 but I think this is one of the enhanced editions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNdb03Hw18M

WW2 fighters in space has always seemed really weird scifi to me. If we ever fight wars in space it will be done by computers trying to out maneuver eachother over millions of miles.

Its near c projectile wepons and knowing which pillar volume will be a deadzone next. The floor is lava and all that shields is shooters leashed to proxies leashed to proxies..

Re: Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

#44
The most marked comparison I’ve seen is between the B-25’s in Catch 22 and the aircraft in Masters of the Air. The real B-25s struggle and climb into the air on takeoff and it’s evidently real. Masters of the Air just had shot after shot of aircraft sitting dully in the sky - so eminently artificial.

Re: Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

#46

How about a space battle scene with and without CGI? Compare "The Dam Busters" from 1955 with propeller airplanes to "A New Hope" with X-wings, title says 1977 but I think this is one of the enhanced editions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNdb03Hw18M

WW2 fighters in space has always seemed really weird scifi to me. If we ever fight wars in space it will be done by computers trying to out maneuver eachother over millions of miles.

> If we ever fight wars in space it will be done by computers trying to out maneuver eachother over millions of miles.

It's entertainment. Dogfights in space with pew-pew lasers are entertaining and make intuitive, if not technical, sense to people who understand how aircraft work. Drones making slight corrective maneuvers and sniping each other at light-second distances isn't entertaining.

Re: Battle Scenes depicted in moving pictures before CGI

#47

How about a space battle scene with and without CGI? Compare "The Dam Busters" from 1955 with propeller airplanes to "A New Hope" with X-wings, title says 1977 but I think this is one of the enhanced editions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNdb03Hw18M

WW2 fighters in space has always seemed really weird scifi to me. If we ever fight wars in space it will be done by computers trying to out maneuver eachother over millions of miles.

You might find this interesting. Detailed breakdown how the physics shape space combat in the highly realistic “Children of a Dead Earth” game. Everything from orbital mechanics to dissipating heat from rail guns. https://childrenofadeadearth.wordpress.com/
Post reply on HN