Live data from Hacker News

GIMP 3.0 is on the way

lwn.net

41–50 of 204 posts

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#41
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think anyone working in print would use Gimp, though?

why is that though? isn't that the bulk of the criticism? bad UX and lack of features needed for print?

I guess - of course it's a chicken-egg sort of a problem. No one's going to use it for print, before it has print-related capabilities - the same can be said for much of the UX, in general.

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#42

I started using GIMP around 2003 as a small child, and I remember being hyped for 3.0 and non-destructive editing even back then. I'm in my thirties now. Slow and steady wins the race. Congrats to the GIMP team, can't imagine the catharsis they will experience when 3.0 officially drops.

not sure if i would call taking 20 years for a release "steady"

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#43
post #4

CMYK, finally. Hopefully this will lead to wider adoption, especially in the professional circles...

Professionals have no problem purchasing their work tools, and no reason to use subpar tools.

Edit: To the FOSS hackers who are down voting. You can buy state of the art professional image editing and design software for less than a hundred dollars. Deliver work to one client and you've paid for all your tools. Why would a professional waste their time with GIMP, when they can use all those hours working for clients with good tools and get paid?

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How relevant is print these days? Still quite relevant, especially in some areas. Think about packaging and labeling, there's just not really a way around print in these areas. Besides that, digital print is the future. Print also needs to become clever and data-driven, more personalized and tailored to the recipient, but that's hard work. Example: Just last week I received a catalogue with the fall/winter collecti…

I don't think anyone working in print would use Gimp, though?

The reason they didn't use GIMP is because they couldn't use GIMP. It simply didn't have necessary capability. When I was working in prepress, I would have done anything to use GIMP. That desperation to escape Photoshop is why Affinity took off.

If Inkscape could get a UI for precision positioning, something you could e.g. design an entry form in; and Scribus could polish up, I think a lot of people would move to a FOSS workflow.

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#48

affinity is the best one: https://affinity.serif.com Affinity V2 Universal Licence For macOS, Windows & iPadOS

Unfortunately, they seem to have moved to a different vendor for payment processing in the past year or two and now I get "The product you selected is not available in your location." Lucky me I still have V1 from a few years back, it's a shame though.

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#49

I started using GIMP around 2003 as a small child, and I remember being hyped for 3.0 and non-destructive editing even back then. I'm in my thirties now. Slow and steady wins the race. Congrats to the GIMP team, can't imagine the catharsis they will experience when 3.0 officially drops.

Indeed, you can't hurry v3.

angry Python noises

Re: GIMP 3.0 is on the way

#50

I use Gimp from time to time, and often get frustrated with its... unique UI. It's nice to see they're hearing feedback and working on it :D A tip for others that feel the same: if you've used Photoshop before and are used to its UI, try the free Photopea website. It's a Photoshop "clone" that works really well in web (I believe it's a solo dev doing it too). It's replaced Gimp for me lately.

I like using pinta for the "easy" cases.
Post reply on HN